Quick String Tension Query

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
spongebob
Intermediate Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:32 am

Quick String Tension Query

Post by spongebob »

Been using the Ric brand strings since I bought this 4003 last year (changed a couple of times). Good product, but I've always used D'addario nickels before, and have got a spare set in the drawer.

Only difference I can see is the gauges. Ric being 45/55/75/105, and the Daddario set 45/65/85/105.

Is there a big change on tension in that? Only concern as my neck is 100% perfect right now, and I don't want to upset it too much!
1974 (February) 4001 JG
User avatar
RickyBubba
Intermediate Member
Posts: 657
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 11:58 am

Re: Quick String Tension Query

Post by RickyBubba »

my gut feeling says let it rip and find out. Unless something is really wonky, you can go back to the Ric strings if you need to with no issues.
User avatar
jayfbv
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 158
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2002 3:10 pm

Re: Quick String Tension Query

Post by jayfbv »

I think the tension is dependent on the core diameter, not the finished string diameter....so kind of impossible to know unless the manufacturers spec it.
User avatar
ram
Senior Member
Posts: 3743
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:55 pm

Re: Quick String Tension Query

Post by ram »

I've used the EXL 170s for decades on my '74 4001... never had a problem. They are a little lighter - 100/80/65/45 but I think others use the heavier gauge strings with no issues. If yours is a newer 4003 I wouldn't worry at all.
The only thing we can perceive are our perceptions - George Berkeley
User avatar
spongebob
Intermediate Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:32 am

Re: Quick String Tension Query

Post by spongebob »

Cool!

Ordered a set today, which I'll fit as soon as they appear! :D
1974 (February) 4001 JG
User avatar
antonius
Member
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 6:15 am

Re: Quick String Tension Query

Post by antonius »

According to John Hall Rickenbacker strings have a tension of about 145 pounds. For a while I was using D'Addario EXL170BT (45-60-80-107), with a stated tension of 162.9 pounds. I would imagine that the D'Addario set you have has a higher tension than that, due to the heavier A and D strings, so you may need to adjust your setup slightly.
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6261
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Re: Quick String Tension Query

Post by cheyenne »

I've used D'addario XL-170's on every Rick I've owned with no problems, (165 lbs. tension) Started using them in the mid '80s and never, ever had a bad string.

I am anxious to try the new D'addario Flex steel set http://www.daddario.com/DADProductFamil ... a3050ce762 and see what they're all about. (156 lbs. tension) *click the link and then go to the "family tension chart"
"Knowledge is Power"
User avatar
iiipopes
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1479
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:02 pm

Re: Quick String Tension Query

Post by iiipopes »

jayfbv wrote:I think the tension is dependent on the core diameter, not the finished string diameter....so kind of impossible to know unless the manufacturers spec it.
No. Tension at pitch is a function of scale length and mass of the string, not its diameter. All other things being equal, a flatwound string at a given diameter will have more tension than a round wound string, because there is more metal in the ribbon wrap, and less internal space between windings than a roundwound. That means more metal in the string, or more mass. Consult the D'Addario, GHS, and CircleK string tension guides you can get online in pdf form.

And yes, there will be a significant difference in the tension in the A and D strings. I used 45-65-85-105 Boomers on a 4001 I used to have back in '80's. It was definitely noticable compared to the stock gauges. The neck can still handle it, of course, with proper truss rod adjustments. Until recently, when I switched over to tapewounds for reasons beyond this thread, I had GHS Progressives 45-60-80-105 on my 4002 for more even tone, feel, response, and the lesser tension of the A & D strings.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”