New 4003 question
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2016 5:14 pm
Hi
My new 4003JG arrived last week. This is my second 4003, the other one was a 2010 model.I did a setup, adjust the neck almost flat, and I adjusted the bridge almost bottomed, to have a low action, approx. 1.5 mm, at the 12th fret E string. My 2010 model was more or less the same, used with almost bottomed bridge. Is it normal on newer 4003s? I'm really afraid of the negative neck angle, I read about it many times. On my other Rick, a 79 4001, if I adjust the bridge to lowest position, the strings lay down to the fretboard. Is this the way it should be? Or they won't lay on the fretboard on new 4003s. If I watch photos or videos, newer ones can be seen with bridges in very low, maybe bottomed position, so maybe mine is normal.
My new 4003JG arrived last week. This is my second 4003, the other one was a 2010 model.I did a setup, adjust the neck almost flat, and I adjusted the bridge almost bottomed, to have a low action, approx. 1.5 mm, at the 12th fret E string. My 2010 model was more or less the same, used with almost bottomed bridge. Is it normal on newer 4003s? I'm really afraid of the negative neck angle, I read about it many times. On my other Rick, a 79 4001, if I adjust the bridge to lowest position, the strings lay down to the fretboard. Is this the way it should be? Or they won't lay on the fretboard on new 4003s. If I watch photos or videos, newer ones can be seen with bridges in very low, maybe bottomed position, so maybe mine is normal.