620 strings

Modern years of Rickenbacker Guitars from 1984 to the present

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

nhlone
New member
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 4:01 pm

620 strings

Post by nhlone »

I just acquired an early 90's jetglo 620 and have .10s on it. The tens feel a little light to me at times. I was looking at D'addario 10.5s wondering if i could just put those on without having to readjust the neck or file the nut. What does everyone else use?
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37132
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: 620 strings

Post by jps »

nhlone wrote:I just acquired an early 90's jetglo 620 and have .10s on it. The tens feel a little light to me at times. I was looking at D'addario 10.5s wondering if i could just put those on without having to readjust the neck or file the nut. What does everyone else use?
Whenever one changes string gauge there is the possibility of having to do one or the other or both. Let us know what you find when you change your strings.
nhlone
New member
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 4:01 pm

Re: 620 strings

Post by nhlone »

So I'm assuming everybody just keeps .10s on their 620s?
User avatar
Tommy
Intermediate Member
Posts: 676
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 8:49 am

Re: 620 strings

Post by Tommy »

nhlone wrote:So I'm assuming everybody just keeps .10s on their 620s?
I can't speak for everybody, but I find it is best for the guitar to keep the stock gauge strings on a guitar.


If you say, "Well, I am used to playing .09s; I don't want .010s on the guitar," well, your fingers can get used to the increase in gauge far better than a guitar's neck can.
danoadam
Junior Member
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:46 am

Re: 620 strings

Post by danoadam »

I use 10s on my 610 and it feels just right
User avatar
antipodean
Senior Member
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:27 am

Re: 620 strings

Post by antipodean »

You can put on what ever suits. 10s seem to work well for most people on average (I have them on my 330), but they may not suit your technique, so feel free to experiment. Heavier gauge strings may need a little filing at the nut, and any change should require tweaks to neck relief and intonation. If the 10s feel tight you probably want to move to lighter gauge strings like 9s.
"I don't want to sound incredulous but I can't believe it" Rex Mossop
Ricman
New member
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 6:09 pm

Re: 620 strings

Post by Ricman »

As I've gotten older I realize one should always use the same gauge strings on your guitar. If you change gauges, you will, most likely, need to do some modification to the neck, bridge, nut, etc.
In my younger ignorant days, I owned a 450/12 model Ric, and from time to time would change it out to a six string guitar with no adjustment to anything. How did I get away with that? Never had a problem playing six or twelve. ?????
Very Occasionally
New member
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:29 am

Re: 620 strings

Post by Very Occasionally »

2018 620FG VB VP________________________________1999 660/12FG
ImageImage

Ernie Ball 9s: .009 - .042__________________Ernie Ball 8s: .008 - .040 12-String Set

My 2¢: Use the strings that work for you. Rics have a dual truss rod system that will adjust your neck to accommodate virtually any string gauge. Assuming the neck isn't warped, etc, and the truss rod adjusters function as intended, working the with neck adjustments and bridge height will get you what you want. And if you're not skilled in setup and adjustments, take it to a tech. Rics are very serviceable and well made instruments.
andyenobs
Junior Member
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2019 10:00 am

Re: 620 strings

Post by andyenobs »

Completely agree with Tommy Marco. Why try and create a problem ? Keep to the gauge the guitar comes with. To be honest I don't think you would really notice the difference anyway. I have 10s on my 6 and 12 acoustics, on my Fender Tele Thinline, my LP Studio, and my 660/6 and my 330/6 and of course the benefit is all the guitars feel the same string wise without having to touch the neck or worrying about it.
Very Occasionally
New member
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:29 am

Re: 620 strings

Post by Very Occasionally »

andyenobs wrote:Completely agree with Tommy Marco. Why try and create a problem ? Keep to the gauge the guitar comes with. To be honest I don't think you would really notice the difference anyway. I have 10s on my 6 and 12 acoustics, on my Fender Tele Thinline, my LP Studio, and my 660/6 and my 330/6 and of course the benefit is all the guitars feel the same string wise without having to touch the neck or worrying about it.
Hi Andy!
I completely disagree with you and Tommy. Totally WRONG, IMNTBHO.

As you know, a 12-string feels very different than the 6-String, even if it's the same brand and model. AND every guitar's neck is slightly differently shaped. AND your Gibsons and Fenders have different frets than the Rics. AND the headstock angles are different, etc. Thus, you're guitars will not "feel the same" even if you do use the same gauge strings.

Therefore the player must determine for herself (or himself) what is suitable for that person's playing style and sound. The "factory" can't do that for you. You have only to consider what gauges your guitar heroes use to know I'm correct on this point.

My $2.
andyenobs
Junior Member
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2019 10:00 am

Re: 620 strings

Post by andyenobs »

I can't say I agree with you. If you use the same gauge on all your guitars the STRINGS will feel the same. Agreed some will feel tighter or easier to play due to the scale length. I do not have any problem going from one guitar to another although my preference is the 660/6 which has low frets. I don't like the higher frets that are used by Fender for example.
It's all about personal opinions but if Rickenbacker put 10's on their guitars it is because they believe they are right for the guitar. Taylor not only recommend what gauge but even the manufacturer on their guitars.
ChuckEds
Junior Member
Posts: 110
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 9:31 am

Re: 620 strings

Post by ChuckEds »

I had 11s on my 2002 620 for years and it was ok, recently switched back to 10s and I like it a little better. Not a big difference either way...
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15029
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: 620 strings

Post by admin »

I believe that Murali's flexible approach is wise. There are many factors that come into play, in my view, but as you move throughout the age span lighter gauge strings still work and you will not sacrifice much with regard to tone. Better than the need for connective tissue repair and physio by a country mile. :lol:
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm

Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
User avatar
iiipopes
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1428
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:02 pm

Re: 620 strings

Post by iiipopes »

admin wrote:I believe that Murali's flexible approach is wise. There are many factors that come into play, in my view, but as you move throughout the age span lighter gauge strings still work and you will not sacrifice much with regard to tone. Better than the need for connective tissue repair and physio by a country mile. :lol:
I agree. Having played both bass and guitar for 43 and 44 years, respectively, I have lightened up through the years. On my 34-inch basses, I used to use 45 or 50's, and now I use 40-95, or 50-65-85-110 tuned down a 1/2 step for one band I am in. On my 12-string, I use a custom 9-42 set out of D'Addario singles, and I only own one remaining 25 1/2 inch scale guitar (the rest are 24 3/4), an acoustic, which is also tuned down 1/2 step.
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15029
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: 620 strings

Post by admin »

Scott: Long may you run! :)
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm

Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: Modern Years - After 1983”