360/12 1985 - Strings Types, Tension, Gauges, etc.
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2019 3:08 pm
Hi Folks,
I have a 1985 Rick 360/12 and I'm trying to find the right strings for the guitar (roundwound, compressed, rollerwound, flatwound,etc). Also the gauge of the lower strings is proving to be very important.
1. I've read and have been told that mid 90's and earlier Rick's are supposed to have a .42 low E string. Indeed when I use a set with .46 low E and thicker low strings, the guitar plays terribly and the tension pulls the neck forward raising the action. In general I prefer the low strings be as close in gauge as possible. Can anyone elaborate on this?
2. I have tried regular .10-.42 rollerwound strings, .10-42 Pick of the Rick Compressed Roundwound Strings. Both sets felt GREAT, but the rounds were too bright, I want to go flatter.
3. I tried GHS Nickel Rollerwound strings, .10-.42 which are like half way between Compressed Rounds and Flats, but way cheaper than actual flats. I notice that even with all the gauges EXACTLY the same as a roundwound set, the flatter strings seem to have more tension. The neck seems to pull forward with these strings, raising the action uncomfortably. Should I just adjust the truss rod? Is this normal? I can image a flatter type string could have even more tension, even if the gauges are the same.
4. TI Flats. I'd like to try some of these but they are expensive and they come in .10-.44 they don't make a .42. Given that I don't like fat low gauge strings in relation to their octave pair, and that they seem to have higher tension. I'm not so sure if this is the route to take. But I really want to try flats!
5. The tension I am referring to with flatter strings/high gauges, it raises the action, presumably because the neck is pulled forward by higher tension. I could/should just adjust the truss rod to fix this correct? I've read that truss rod isn't for adjusting action, but in this case, it is. Right?
Can anyone offer any advice?
Thanks.
I have a 1985 Rick 360/12 and I'm trying to find the right strings for the guitar (roundwound, compressed, rollerwound, flatwound,etc). Also the gauge of the lower strings is proving to be very important.
1. I've read and have been told that mid 90's and earlier Rick's are supposed to have a .42 low E string. Indeed when I use a set with .46 low E and thicker low strings, the guitar plays terribly and the tension pulls the neck forward raising the action. In general I prefer the low strings be as close in gauge as possible. Can anyone elaborate on this?
2. I have tried regular .10-.42 rollerwound strings, .10-42 Pick of the Rick Compressed Roundwound Strings. Both sets felt GREAT, but the rounds were too bright, I want to go flatter.
3. I tried GHS Nickel Rollerwound strings, .10-.42 which are like half way between Compressed Rounds and Flats, but way cheaper than actual flats. I notice that even with all the gauges EXACTLY the same as a roundwound set, the flatter strings seem to have more tension. The neck seems to pull forward with these strings, raising the action uncomfortably. Should I just adjust the truss rod? Is this normal? I can image a flatter type string could have even more tension, even if the gauges are the same.
4. TI Flats. I'd like to try some of these but they are expensive and they come in .10-.44 they don't make a .42. Given that I don't like fat low gauge strings in relation to their octave pair, and that they seem to have higher tension. I'm not so sure if this is the route to take. But I really want to try flats!
5. The tension I am referring to with flatter strings/high gauges, it raises the action, presumably because the neck is pulled forward by higher tension. I could/should just adjust the truss rod to fix this correct? I've read that truss rod isn't for adjusting action, but in this case, it is. Right?
Can anyone offer any advice?
Thanks.