Explaining the unique sound of the 360v64

Modern years of Rickenbacker Guitars from 1984 to the present

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
fretbuzzard
New member
Posts: 44
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:16 am

Explaining the unique sound of the 360v64

Post by fretbuzzard »

I’ve been able to play a couple of 360v64 6-strings, and to my ear they sound unlike every other Rickenbacker I’ve played: darker, with the neck pickup in particular bordering on muddy. I had always chalked this up to the 12k toasters, but on a whim I decided to have a look at the schematic. I was surprised to see that the 360v64 was spec-ed with 250K pots. Combined with the pickups, that might explain a lot of what I’m hearing!

So which do you suppose contributes more to the darker tone here: the pickups or the pots? If you were looking to liven up a 360v64, which would you look to change?
User avatar
iiipopes
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1430
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:02 pm

Re: Explaining the unique sound of the 360v64

Post by iiipopes »

First, these guitars may not have 12k toasters; they may use "regular" toasters. That said, it is everything: pickup windings, if they have the increased windings, which does two things: raises the inductance of the coil which we perceive as more mids, and intra-coil capacitance which cuts the top end a little bit (especially if it is a short magnet pickup because less gauss generally translates to less articulation bite); the pickup being wayyy upstream in the 24th "double octave" node position which may cancel out some overtones so the pickup sounds dark or hollow, and the 250 kohm pots that can load a little bit more of the top end to ground, compared to the 330 or 500 kohm pots, which by their nature have a higher value resistance to ground and therefore less loading on the pickup, which translates to a higher resonant peak in the frequency response of the pickup, which we perceive as jangle.
User avatar
fretbuzzard
New member
Posts: 44
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:16 am

Re: Explaining the unique sound of the 360v64

Post by fretbuzzard »

Sure, that all makes perfect sense. Has anyone here swapped out pickups and/or pots on one of these? What were your results?
User avatar
8mileshigher
Senior Member
Posts: 4871
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 12:34 pm

Explaining the unique sound of the 360v64

Post by 8mileshigher »

This is a very interesting thread and I'm looking forward to seeing more comments from fellow V-64 owners on the V-64 Hot Toasters and the 250k Ω Pots
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10854
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Explaining the unique sound of the 360v64

Post by jdogric12 »

OP - depends, what year(s)? Toasters were "hot" (12k) in the 80's, all the way up to '99 or so when they got phased in following their introduction on the limited run 425V63, 450V63 and 325/12V63, and the new 7.4k were typically called scatterwound, since they were more similar to vintage toasters. They weren't really scatterwound, but a machine approximated the "scattered" windings, as I understand it.

When did the 360V64 go away, and when were the later limited 360C63's (6, not the ubiquitous 12) introduced?
User avatar
kennyhowes
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4908
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2001 1:03 am
Contact:

Re: Explaining the unique sound of the 360v64

Post by kennyhowes »

This model falls squarely in the period of the Hot Toasters, so my bet is that is what you’re hearing.

If your knobs are turned up all the way, it shouldn’t matter what their resistance is.
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6650
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Explaining the unique sound of the 360v64

Post by aceonbass »

The 250k pots (measuring closer to 175k), and 330k pots (measuring closer to 280k) are probably the main reason for the darker tone in any Rick that has those pots. This is why I build wiring harnesses for these with the same specs RIC used in the 60's through the 1990's, which were 500k pots for tone and 250k pots for volume.
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15029
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Explaining the unique sound of the 360v64

Post by admin »

aceonbass wrote:The 250k pots (measuring closer to 175k), and 330k pots (measuring closer to 280k) are probably the main reason for the darker tone in any Rick that has those pots. This is why I build wiring harnesses for these with the same specs RIC used in the 60's through the 1990's, which were 500k pots for tone and 250k pots for volume.
Sage advice, Dane. I appreciate your tone and volume. :)
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm

Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10854
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Explaining the unique sound of the 360v64

Post by jdogric12 »

Looks like the last date for orders for the 360V64 was 12/31/2000, and the last we know of rolled off the line August 2001. I'd guess that some of those got scatterwounds, but Kenny knows best. When did scatterwounds jump to other models besides the 3 in the limited run?
User avatar
kennyhowes
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4908
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2001 1:03 am
Contact:

Re: Explaining the unique sound of the 360v64

Post by kennyhowes »

jdogric12 wrote:Looks like the last date for orders for the 360V64 was 12/31/2000, and the last we know of rolled off the line August 2001. I'd guess that some of those got scatterwounds, but Kenny knows best. When did scatterwounds jump to other models besides the 3 in the limited run?
Without doing any solid research, I will respond with “PDQ.”
User avatar
fretbuzzard
New member
Posts: 44
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:16 am

Re: Explaining the unique sound of the 360v64

Post by fretbuzzard »

aceonbass wrote: This is why I build wiring harnesses for these with the same specs RIC used in the 60's through the 1990's, which were 500k pots for tone and 250k pots for volume.
Thanks so much for lending your expertise! Is there any reason beyond tradition for your favoring the 500k/250k mix? Has anyone gone for 500k pots for both volume and tone, Gibson-style?
User avatar
MatthewBrown
New member
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 5:42 am

Re: Explaining the unique sound of the 360v64

Post by MatthewBrown »

Can anyone confirm if the Ric played on the right is a 360v64? Curious because of the R tailpiece and high gain pick ups. If it’s not, what is it?

https://youtu.be/8Kl172XqWv4
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13836
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Explaining the unique sound of the 360v64

Post by sloop_john_b »

MatthewBrown wrote:Can anyone confirm if the Ric played on the right is a 360v64? Curious because of the R tailpiece and high gain pick ups. If it’s not, what is it?

https://youtu.be/8Kl172XqWv4
That is a late 80’s / early 90’s 360WB (note for instance the 24 fret neck as compared to the 21 fret v64).
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: Modern Years - After 1983”