Page 1 of 1

84 Rickenbscker V64. Advice Welcome!

Posted: Fri May 28, 2021 1:32 am
by Johnnylydon
Good morning guys. Hope everyone is well! I’m back into my playing after 6 years and thought I might treat myself to a 12 string Ric. It’s a bit unusual I think. Or maybe not? I’ll let you with more expertise decide! This one is from Nov 84. I purchased it as an early V64. I really like the guitar. The finish is unusual for a V64 but I have seen thin bursts oon other 84 models. I’m intrigued to know what I actually have.I’m pretty sure it is an early V64 .. the inlays aren’t full width which strikes me as odd but maybe this is how they were?
Any advice would be immensely appreciated!
My sincerest thanks in advance!
J
https://imgur.com/gallery/bsvuRi1?s=sms

Re: 84 Rickenbscker V64. Advice Welcome!

Posted: Fri May 28, 2021 10:11 am
by jps
Johnnylydon wrote:Good morning guys. Hope everyone is well! I’m back into my playing after 6 years and thought I might treat myself to a 12 string Ric. It’s a bit unusual I think. Or maybe not? I’ll let you with more expertise decide! This one is from Nov 84. I purchased it as an early V64. I really like the guitar. The finish is unusual for a V64 but I have seen thin bursts oon other 84 models. I’m intrigued to know what I actually have.I’m pretty sure it is an early V64 .. the inlays aren’t full width which strikes me as odd but maybe this is how they were?
Any advice would be immensely appreciated!
My sincerest thanks in advance!
J
https://imgur.com/gallery/bsvuRi1?s=sms
Your image link isn't working for me, just a blank 10% grey field, but given your description, I'd venture to guess it is a 360/12WB.

Re: 84 Rickenbscker V64. Advice Welcome!

Posted: Fri May 28, 2021 11:02 am
by maxwell
(Works on my Apple iPad….). BTW, lately I have been getting web pages not opening correctly (blank), and usually refreshing the page seems to fix that (on iPad and PC); weird.

Re: 84 Rickenbscker V64. Advice Welcome!

Posted: Fri May 28, 2021 12:19 pm
by collin
jps wrote:
Johnnylydon wrote:Good morning guys. Hope everyone is well! I’m back into my playing after 6 years and thought I might treat myself to a 12 string Ric. It’s a bit unusual I think. Or maybe not? I’ll let you with more expertise decide! This one is from Nov 84. I purchased it as an early V64. I really like the guitar. The finish is unusual for a V64 but I have seen thin bursts oon other 84 models. I’m intrigued to know what I actually have.I’m pretty sure it is an early V64 .. the inlays aren’t full width which strikes me as odd but maybe this is how they were?
Any advice would be immensely appreciated!
My sincerest thanks in advance!
J
https://imgur.com/gallery/bsvuRi1?s=sms
Your image link isn't working for me, just a blank 10% grey field, but given your description, I'd venture to guess it is a 360/12WB.
Nope, it has 21 frets.

Re: 84 Rickenbscker V64. Advice Welcome!

Posted: Fri May 28, 2021 2:21 pm
by jdogric12
Guessing (assuming it's original) this is a very rare transitional between the 360/12B and the 360/12V64.

Re: 84 Rickenbscker V64. Advice Welcome!

Posted: Fri May 28, 2021 3:28 pm
by jps
Can someone attach a photo directly, here, thanks.

Re: 84 Rickenbscker V64. Advice Welcome!

Posted: Fri May 28, 2021 4:56 pm
by collin
jdogric12 wrote:Guessing (assuming it's original) this is a very rare transitional between the 360/12B and the 360/12V64.
Like this one: https://www.rockwall-guitars.de/en/rick ... type-1985/

But that has Hi Gains.

The Fireglo in the OP's photos is really unusual looking, even for that era, as is the overall body shape. Hard to put my finger on the shape but compare with the RockWall link above and they do look different.

Re: 84 Rickenbscker V64. Advice Welcome!

Posted: Fri May 28, 2021 5:15 pm
by Johnnylydon
Maybe this might open for more if you guys?

https://imgur.com/gallery/bsvuRi1?s=sms

Re: 84 Rickenbscker V64. Advice Welcome!

Posted: Sat May 29, 2021 4:07 pm
by JakeK
jps wrote:Can someone attach a photo directly, here, thanks.
Full body photo: https://i.imgur.com/hPKcX5F.jpg

Re: 84 Rickenbscker V64. Advice Welcome!

Posted: Sat May 29, 2021 5:30 pm
by jps
JakeK wrote:
jps wrote:Can someone attach a photo directly, here, thanks.
Full body photo: https://i.imgur.com/hPKcX5F.jpg
Thanks, Jake! Your link works. 8)

Looks like a B Series 360/12BWB, from here.

Re: 84 Rickenbscker V64. Advice Welcome!

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 3:47 am
by doctorwho
FWIW the original link worked with my Android phone as well as with Mozilla Firefox for Linux.

I don't think that it's a B Series; as someone else pointed out, it has 21 frets (B series had 24 frets), plus it has a trapeze tailpiece (instead of the B Series R tailpiece) and, more importantly, it has a the square-heel neck (the B Series had the typical rounded heel) ..

The color pattern ("no-burst" :shock: :? ) is similar to that of the early B Series, such as this one in the Register:

http://www.rickresource.com/register/us ... 9133/3.jpg.

Re: 84 Rickenbscker V64. Advice Welcome!

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 8:40 pm
by doctorwho
I hope that the OP doesn't mind this ... here is a screenshot of one of the pictures for posterity's sake.
Screenshot from 2021-05-30 00-33-21_crpd.jpg

Re: 84 Rickenbscker V64. Advice Welcome!

Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2021 1:54 pm
by stringsncords
Cool Guitar.

A 21-fret, toastered, square-heeled, trapezed, unbound sound hole, with a very unusual FireGlo pattern.

Let the games begin!

Re: 84 Rickenbscker V64. Advice Welcome!

Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2021 3:13 pm
by jps
Yep, an interesting mix of features we have here.

Re: 84 Rickenbscker V64. Advice Welcome!

Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2021 11:50 pm
by Ontario_RIC_fan
Someone has put it into the register already I see. SN is XK1432, so made in November 1984, two months after John Hall and his wife buy the company from FC Hall.

http://www.rickresource.com/register/vi ... 6order%3D5


I responded to Gaz on Facebook.

"John Hall knew that there was a huge demand for recreations of the instruments played by the Beatles, and that the fastest way to get the company profitable again was to satisfy the demand for those instruments.

The V series flyer is produced in early 1985, and likely that the earliest examples were produced for trade shows, like NAMM which happens in January. Some of the orders still on the books were likely for B series instruments, and the precise details of those were never precisely decided, as they were mix and match depending on what parts were in stock. I have seen an August 1984, 360/12 that has all of the same features as a v series, although whether it was the prototype, or was just retro fitted after being ordered as a B series is unclear."

(Actually I misremembered this instrument - it is actually a B series with a R-tail. I just checked the register).

John Hall standardized production, so that the bread and butter models like the 330 and 4003 could still be produced, while keeping the remaining stock of Kluson style tuners and toasters, for the reissue models."

As a production item, the earliest v64 examples are from March 1985, YC

I don't think that the instrument is a WB VP, mostly because the sound hole isn't bound.

Is it perhaps something created when they were experimenting? Perhaps an employee guitar? Perhaps a guitar originally ordered as a B series and sent out the door without the R tail?

I really miss the days when John Hall would chime in with a memory, that would answer the question!