Poll: whether or not to post pictures that are now missing

General Rickenbacker discussion

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply

Should I post pictures that are now missing in older threads?

Yes
6
100%
No
0
No votes
Neutral
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 6

User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12524
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Poll: whether or not to post pictures that are now missing

Post by doctorwho »

I have noticed that a lot of older threads have lost their pictures, e.g., my posts of pictures from NAMM 2004:

viewtopic.php?t=41467&hilit=NAMM


I assume that this happened when the server change-over happened. So, I was wondering whether it would be worth my time to go back through my old posts and add the now-missing pictures to the threads for posterity's sake.

What are your thoughts on the matter?
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
maxwell
Member
Posts: 363
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 4:14 pm

Re: Poll: whether or not to post pictures that are now missing

Post by maxwell »

Yes. Are posts here locked out from editing after a few hours time? I guess I should check. Anyway, old posts/discussions are invaluable, and “one picture is worth a thousand words.”
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10854
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Poll: whether or not to post pictures that are now missing

Post by jdogric12 »

I recently noticed some old pictures didn't appear on mobile Chrome, but do appear in desktop Safari.
FWIW.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker General: by Howard Bishop”