Page 1 of 1
Jet glo
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2005 2:17 pm
by saturn
why is jet glo called jet glo when its just solid black? theres no "glo" to it (or am I missing something?)
I would think a real "jet glo" would be a mixture of a solid black edge with an ebony stained inner (to show wood grain under translucent black).
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2005 3:13 pm
by johnhall
Glo is short for "Gloss". It's jet black and it's glossy.
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2005 3:47 pm
by loverickbass
Oh it's got glo! You can see your reflection in it. Nothing like Jetglo with White Binding! Except maybe Jetglo with Checked binding. Yummy.
Cole
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:09 am
by saturn
not saying its not nice (its very nice), I was just thinking like "fireglo" etc... like "glow"...
now I know! thanks.
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:05 am
by thx1955
Andrew, I like the idea of the solid black gradually fading to Maple, would look really nice ...
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:08 am
by oreca
Kinda like this?
I forgot the name of the color precisely.
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:42 am
by johnhall
I also thought a "black burst" would look nice.
I changed my mind instantly when we did one as a test. It was just plain ugly and we went ahead and finished it off as a regular Jetglo.
A center color, like a red as above might be better.
By the way, the guitar above is about what many of the Fireglo's sprayed in the 60's are going to look like in 10 years or so, due to yellowing. The modern guitars that people are calling "pink" now will look like those 60's guitars in 20 years or so and also eventually look like this when your grandchildren have your guitar.
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 7:02 am
by incubus2432
A solid color to black would look nice. Silver to black would be my #1 pick.....with black hardware of course

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 7:32 am
by jingle_jangle
The pic posted above is not really a fade directly from black to natural, it seems--there's a third color, red, sprayed on there. The transition from black to maple would look pretty bad, IMO.
It comes down to: how ya ever gonna beat Fireglo??? Although MB comes (er, CAME) close!
I've seen Gretsches finished as Brian described (except with chrome hardware) and wasn't really impressed.
Can you guys just try to imagine what the task of picking the COY must be like? Besides the occasional reissue, it is what causes the most chatter and excitement (and criticism?).
RIC must come up with something NEW, with near-universal appeal, that will (hopefully) look great years from now, and still have appeal a generation or even two hence.
Too bad about the cross-contamination problem with metallic particles. In a semi-production situation, with the kinds of problems--space and Air Quality regs--that RIC operates under, it's easy to begin to understand the practical considerations.
But metallics--the thought opens all kinds of COY possibilities far into the future!
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 7:33 am
by tony_carey
I thought that the 'glo' referred to the little warm glow that you have deep inside you, when you own a Rickenbacker!
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:29 am
by loverickbass
...yeah but if fireglo fades to black in 40 years or so what does jetglo fade to...pink fireglo?
Just kiddin'
Cole
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:45 am
by jeff_ulmer
Black to transparent blue looks very good, as do blue to green bursts, or red/orange. There are many color combinations that I would prefer over fireglo.
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:19 am
by jingle_jangle
Ulmer, you weren't driving that two tone purple and green ("burp-glo") Rolls-Royce I saw last week, were you?
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:31 am
by jeff_ulmer
No, the Rolls is in the shop. I was driving the 1955 tri-tone Chevy - lavender, moss green and turquoise. (that color combo can be seen in Jacques Tati's brilliant "Mon Oncle").
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 12:24 pm
by rictified
If Fireglos are getting darker then that explains why I remember Azureglo as a light blue color back in the 70's when I first saw them. Mine is almost the smae shade as Midnight Blue now.