Hey Mark the MD!!
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2001 9:52 am
I know this has been visited before, but I still have questions regarding the Flatwound/Roundwound string debate on the 4001s.
Rickenbacker continues to recommend the flats due to the "excessive tension" of roundwound strings.
I cannot find this to be true. All of my research indicates that flats have the greater tension in similar gauges. D'Addario and TI publish their tensions right on their websites.
Stainless or nickel Flats = greater tension than either stainless, nickel or half-round wound strings.
What's the deal here - I'm confused?
I like 035-090 nickel roundwounds on my 1980 4001. I have .012" relief and am blessed with being able to achieve 1/32" action from fret 12 on up. It plays and sounds beautiful. I want to keep it that way, but cannot for the life of me understand the tension debate between flats and rounds. Can you, or anyone in the know, offer an explanation that someone as simple minded as myself can understand?
Thanks.
Rickenbacker continues to recommend the flats due to the "excessive tension" of roundwound strings.
I cannot find this to be true. All of my research indicates that flats have the greater tension in similar gauges. D'Addario and TI publish their tensions right on their websites.
Stainless or nickel Flats = greater tension than either stainless, nickel or half-round wound strings.
What's the deal here - I'm confused?
I like 035-090 nickel roundwounds on my 1980 4001. I have .012" relief and am blessed with being able to achieve 1/32" action from fret 12 on up. It plays and sounds beautiful. I want to keep it that way, but cannot for the life of me understand the tension debate between flats and rounds. Can you, or anyone in the know, offer an explanation that someone as simple minded as myself can understand?
Thanks.