In 1967, the act of “taking ends”
became common in Liverpool. Supporters of the visiting team would
often sit behind their goalie, and fans of the home team would attempt
to chase the rivals out of the area. The goal of taking ends was
to steal as many of the opposing team’s flags, scarves and signs as possible,
and then throw in a few punches before the police intervened (Marsh et
al., 1996). These young men formed alliances and used the "goal end
terraces" as their territory. The battles that occurred as
a result of these “ends” can be compared to modern day gang rivalries (Football
& Football Hooliganism, 1997).
In its origin as a modern day crime
of the 1960’s, football hooliganism was also been referred to as the "British
Disease" (Football Violence in Europe-Executive Summary). One of
the contributing factors to the British Disease is often argued to be the
presence of alcohol. Alcohol played an important role in the emergence
of football hooliganism. The media in Britain, in particular, emphasized
alcohol as the primary explanation for such unusually violent and unruly
behavior (Football Violence in Europe-Executive Summary). Other researchers
claim that alcohol may effect the hooligans’ behavior, but explains that
it is not a primary cause, since the hooligans appeared to be aggressive
when consuming alcohol or not (Football & Football Hooliganism, 1997).
Furthermore, it has been suggested
that the media itself may have increased the number of instances, by appealing
to the hooligan's desire for fame and glory (Fact-Sheet Four: Hooliganism).
The tabloids sensationalize the instants and severity of the hooligan
attacks, which some researchers argue, served to fan the flames (Football
Violence in Europe-Executive Summary). The hooligans took pride in
their actions, and relished in the media attention they received.
Part
4: Aggression Theory
|