620 vs. 660 for Tele player Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

The Rickenbacker Forum » Archives - Rickenbacker Guitars Jan - July 2005 » 620 vs. 660 for Tele player « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  ClosedClosed: New threads not accepted on this page        
Archive through April 07, 2005Howard Bishop (Ozove10 04-07-05  12:28 am
Archive through April 09, 2005Howard Bishop (Ozove10 04-09-05  08:30 am
  ClosedClosed: New threads not accepted on this page        

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Carl Neilson (Fenderslash)
New member
Username: Fenderslash

Post Number: 5
Registered: 04-2005
Posted From: 203.164.201.47
Posted on Saturday, April 09, 2005 - 09:35 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Ha ha. Thanks for the effort Steve. But...

I was hoping for a picture like this one of my two favourite babies, just so I can get a feel for the relative size comparison between the Tele and the Ric.

And yes, a 620 would have been nice..."small" Tele and big Firebird
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Minutaglio (Jsm610)
Senior Member
Username: Jsm610

Post Number: 131
Registered: 04-2004
Posted From: 66.135.163.170
Posted on Saturday, April 09, 2005 - 10:03 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

6
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mitch Berger (Octagon)
Intermediate Member
Username: Octagon

Post Number: 65
Registered: 03-2005
Posted From: 24.118.136.83
Posted on Saturday, April 09, 2005 - 10:06 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Maybe this pic of my 340 and my strat will give you some idea

340 strat
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Carl Neilson (Fenderslash)
New member
Username: Fenderslash

Post Number: 6
Registered: 04-2005
Posted From: 203.164.201.84
Posted on Wednesday, April 13, 2005 - 03:26 am:   Edit Post Print Post

Thanks guys. Judging from John's photo it looks like I'll be a little cramped up compared to my usual playing "stance", so I'm sure that'll feel awkward for a while. But hopefully it's something that I'll get used to given time and practice.

This thread has been very helpful.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

scott henry (Meez)
New member
Username: Meez

Post Number: 13
Registered: 03-2005
Posted From: 65.50.159.111
Posted on Wednesday, April 13, 2005 - 07:06 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Carl,
I just got my 620, two days ago, which has the same body as the 660 and I've played a Telecaster for years.
It took about 6 strums to get used to.
You will have no problem adapting.

Scott
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ron Plichta (Highway_star)
Senior Member
Username: Highway_star

Post Number: 361
Registered: 10-2004
Posted From: 141.116.81.184
Posted on Tuesday, April 26, 2005 - 05:18 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Sonically, which model comes closer to a Tele sound, the 620 or the 660?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Minutaglio (Jsm610)
Senior Member
Username: Jsm610

Post Number: 150
Registered: 04-2004
Posted From: 66.135.163.170
Posted on Tuesday, April 26, 2005 - 11:59 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

My $.02 is that a 620 nor a 660 sound much like a Tele at all...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Noel Christian Riddell (Longhouse)
Senior Member
Username: Longhouse

Post Number: 252
Registered: 04-2003
Posted From: 68.217.135.72
Posted on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 - 01:03 am:   Edit Post Print Post

My 650A could nail some Tele tones.