| Author |
Message |
   
paul wilczynski (Jingle_jangle)
Senior Member Username: Jingle_jangle
Post Number: 1387 Registered: 12-2004 Posted From: 63.193.9.8
| | Posted on Thursday, April 07, 2005 - 07:09 pm: |
|
OK, bring it over! |
   
Robert Callaghan (Red_rob)
Member Username: Red_rob
Post Number: 60 Registered: 02-2005 Posted From: 194.74.48.4
| | Posted on Thursday, April 07, 2005 - 07:13 pm: |
|
Fireglo. Has to be Fireglo. Nothing else for the 330 but fireglo fireglo fireglo. Save the Jetglo for when you get hooked and go after your 360-12. Like me..... |
   
Dan Brookes (Fireglo330)
Junior Member Username: Fireglo330
Post Number: 39 Registered: 03-2005 Posted From: 130.76.32.145
| | Posted on Thursday, April 07, 2005 - 07:16 pm: |
|
Actually, I mean generally speaking that photos on the net sometimes don't represent the true color. |
   
Mark Bailey (Onionbails)
Intermediate Member Username: Onionbails
Post Number: 67 Registered: 05-2002 Posted From: 203.4.223.195
| | Posted on Friday, April 08, 2005 - 02:48 am: |
|
I have a beaten up '66 Rose, Morris 1998 with finish wear evident nearly all over the body. Instead of digital photos "not doing it justice" they actually make it look in better condition than it really is. I'm not talking about low resolution hiding the flaws, even high res and good colour matching make it look great. I'm just stating this in case people are under the wrong impression that guitars are always better in real life than in photos. |
   
Dan Brookes (Fireglo330)
Member Username: Fireglo330
Post Number: 41 Registered: 03-2005 Posted From: 130.76.32.16
| | Posted on Friday, April 08, 2005 - 12:22 pm: |
|
I'm talking about the quality of the photo itself (resolution) not about hiding flaws. Usually photos on the net are around 72 dpi. |
   
Anthony Carey (Tony_carey)
Senior Member Username: Tony_carey
Post Number: 481 Registered: 10-2004 Posted From: 81.157.61.60
| | Posted on Friday, April 08, 2005 - 12:55 pm: |
|
Dan, you're right about that,not only resolution, but some digital cameras don't render red particularly well (mine for example-not a cheap one either!) Mark, your also right, my beat up 330 looks almost mint in a photo. Beat up, but beautiful!!! |
   
John McKelvy (Wormdiet)
Senior Member Username: Wormdiet
Post Number: 570 Registered: 01-2003 Posted From: 152.22.12.56
| | Posted on Friday, April 08, 2005 - 01:25 pm: |
|
I'm gonna buck the trend and recommend Jetglo. Because, simply, I like it more But get what you want. |
   
Dane Paul Terry (Wayang)
Advanced Member Username: Wayang
Post Number: 92 Registered: 03-2005 Posted From: 207.200.116.7
| | Posted on Friday, April 08, 2005 - 01:48 pm: |
|
It sort of depends on application...are you going to be playing out and if so, what kind of band/music? This is sort of a Lemmy vs. Squire aesthetic debate, or in this case, maybe Lemmy vs. McGuinn... |
   
paul wilczynski (Jingle_jangle)
Senior Member Username: Jingle_jangle
Post Number: 1392 Registered: 12-2004 Posted From: 63.193.9.8
| | Posted on Friday, April 08, 2005 - 02:21 pm: |
|
"Lemmy" and "aesthetic" mentioned in the same sentence? Oh, sorry--was that arrogant? |
   
Dane Paul Terry (Wayang)
Advanced Member Username: Wayang
Post Number: 98 Registered: 03-2005 Posted From: 207.200.116.7
| | Posted on Friday, April 08, 2005 - 02:36 pm: |
|
How 'bout a term Lemmy fans can wear with pride? "Ignarrogance!" Anthing can catch on; as you may recall, it was once uncool to be called a punk... |