Archive through April 12, 2005 Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

The Rickenbacker Forum » Archives - Rickenbacker Guitars Jan - July 2005 » Thoughts on the 650 line » Archive through April 12, 2005 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Alex Smith (Roadrunners)
Senior Member
Username: Roadrunners

Post Number: 294
Registered: 08-2004
Posted From: 65.170.120.116
Posted on Tuesday, April 12, 2005 - 02:03 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

He seems like a very egotistical person from some of the things i've read. Ever work with him Mr. Hall?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

paul wilczynski (Jingle_jangle)
Senior Member
Username: Jingle_jangle

Post Number: 1462
Registered: 12-2004
Posted From: 63.193.9.8
Posted on Tuesday, April 12, 2005 - 02:16 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

A bit of trivia:

Ed likes to put us on. Word has it that he called it the "Van Campen" mod because while he was doing the first one, he was eating a can of pork and beans.

He combined the brand name with the last syllable of Eddie Van Halen's name and--voila! A legend was born.

But, sadly, it was born with a weak neck.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ken Joseph (Ken_j)
Senior Member
Username: Ken_j

Post Number: 395
Registered: 07-2003
Posted From: 198.208.223.35
Posted on Tuesday, April 12, 2005 - 03:22 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

This is my first guitar with 24 frets. 21 or 22 have always been enough for me. Even so I can get to the 24th fret on this with no discomfort. So why shave it down? Why screw up a perfect finish?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Hall (Johnhall)
Senior Member
Username: Johnhall

Post Number: 886
Registered: 01-2003
Posted From: 64.105.135.123
Posted on Tuesday, April 12, 2005 - 04:02 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Let's just say that Ed is a character and one-of-a-kind!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Peter Becker (Dr_evil)
Junior Member
Username: Dr_evil

Post Number: 31
Registered: 01-2004
Posted From: 195.93.60.113
Posted on Tuesday, April 12, 2005 - 05:03 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Back to the original issue: I use a 650 Dakota and a 650 Colorado for recording for five years now and haven't used another guitar ever since. You can get any sound from a 650, it's simply the best guitar for me. I agree that it slides from your leg if you are seated, a thicker body with sharper edges would stop that. So if RIC ever updates the line...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ken Joseph (Ken_j)
Senior Member
Username: Ken_j

Post Number: 397
Registered: 07-2003
Posted From: 69.209.154.171
Posted on Tuesday, April 12, 2005 - 05:14 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Peter, Since you have two of these do you agree with my findings that I posted earlier in this thread: "It seems that the pickups are out of phase though. With both selected it seems to loose some bottom end and gets a little of that nasal like tone." ? JH maybee you could chime in also.

My Colorado is an '04 and I don't have a problem with it sliding off my leg. I have been wearing jeans this time of year. Could it be that jeans have enough friction to prevent this? This guitar is neither neck heavy or light.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Steve Carsello (Steverok)
Junior Member
Username: Steverok

Post Number: 28
Registered: 03-2005
Posted From: 136.182.2.222
Posted on Tuesday, April 12, 2005 - 05:20 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Isn't the 650 body the same as the 620 and 660? I would imagine that, if a 650 doesn't sit well, neither would the 620 or 660. Of course, people have varying opinions on this, many of us have never seen any 600 Ric in person. I wish the 650C had the same type of unlaquered neck as the 650D, that could be a shredder.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ken Joseph (Ken_j)
Senior Member
Username: Ken_j

Post Number: 399
Registered: 07-2003
Posted From: 69.209.154.171
Posted on Tuesday, April 12, 2005 - 05:32 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

The 650s are contoured where the 610s and 620s are not. I am not sure how rounded the 610s and 620s are on that edge. I had a 610 but I just can't recall from memory and I can't find a good enough pic on this computer. Maybe at work.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

paul wilczynski (Jingle_jangle)
Senior Member
Username: Jingle_jangle

Post Number: 1466
Registered: 12-2004
Posted From: 63.193.9.8
Posted on Tuesday, April 12, 2005 - 06:11 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

The 650 body is radiused all around and has a "softer" look as a result, although the footprint is the same.

My 660 has the edge which rests on your knee rounded off, anthough the front edge is sharp all around. The slick conversion varnish finish of the 620s and 660s is the culprit on slide-off.

That having been said, mine never slides. As I indicated before, it's my "sofa" guitar.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Stan Castles (Buzfluhart)
Senior Member
Username: Buzfluhart

Post Number: 431
Registered: 06-2004
Posted From: 68.89.240.217
Posted on Tuesday, April 12, 2005 - 06:19 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

I have a TP 660 and it rests fine. The slight contour difference, the edgy side of it, makes it easy to play, and granted very comfortably from a resting position on the sofa (as Paul said), or otherwise. The best of the 600 series I think.