Ricks vs fender Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

The Rickenbacker Forum » Archives - Rickenbacker Guitars Jan - July 2005 » Ricks vs fender « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  ClosedClosed: New threads not accepted on this page        
Archive through May 01, 2005Mike Ferguson (Fergs10 05-01-05  08:57 pm
  ClosedClosed: New threads not accepted on this page        

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Nick St. Hilaire (Nick_st_hilaire)
New member
Username: Nick_st_hilaire

Post Number: 5
Registered: 03-2005
Posted From: 71.100.16.198
Posted on Sunday, May 01, 2005 - 10:56 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Strats are utilitarian. Much like my truck, it gets an oil change regularly, but a wash and wax is twice a year. My car and my Ric..... too much doting is never enough.

I once passed (foolishly) on a 450 which had the finish worn off from the back of the neck and the frets were similarly worn, but the body and headstock were flawless. That was a guitar that was well loved.

Nick
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

paul wilczynski (Jingle_jangle)
Senior Member
Username: Jingle_jangle

Post Number: 1852
Registered: 12-2004
Posted From: 24.23.164.148
Posted on Sunday, May 01, 2005 - 11:13 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

I do like the "well-loved" analogy.

I'm sure it'll be only a matter of time before it turns up in a CME eBay ad...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

danhamilton (Qmoder)
Senior Member
Username: Qmoder

Post Number: 107
Registered: 12-2003
Posted From: 216.180.65.58
Posted on Monday, May 02, 2005 - 02:41 am:   Edit Post Print Post

I'm with R.C. I take good care of all of my guitars. Ric's and Strat's all have their strong points.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Lee Kear (Aristeas)
Senior Member
Username: Aristeas

Post Number: 195
Registered: 07-2002
Posted From: 210.49.55.111
Posted on Monday, May 02, 2005 - 07:13 am:   Edit Post Print Post

My experience is that buying the guitar, not the name is the best way to go. With a couple of exceptions I've always bought my guitars second-hand, and prefer to do so. A good instrument gets better with age while a bad one shows it's flaws, and I'm occasionally surprised by guitarists who will 'only buy a new one'. That there are people who wil pay extra money to buy a new 'relic-ed' guitar I find absolutely astounding!

I wont buy anything battered or misused and I've never had to. I found my '96 Strat Plus after a month of looking and bought a top of the range instrument at less than the retail price of a run of the mill Fender product. And it's still the best guitar I've ever played, fast'n'low neck, beautiful tone, beautifully balanced, a delight to play - if it sounded like a Ric it would be perfect.

I've never been disappointed with any guitar I've played before I've bought it, while buying thru Ebay or ordered from the retailer is as Phil says, a crapshoot.