Archive through April 28, 2005 Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

The Rickenbacker Forum » Archives - Rickenbacker Guitars Jan - July 2005 » Prefered pickup settings? » Archive through April 28, 2005 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John McKelvy (Wormdiet)
Senior Member
Username: Wormdiet

Post Number: 602
Registered: 01-2003
Posted From: 152.22.12.56
Posted on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 - 11:39 am:   Edit Post Print Post

What do you all use?

I find myself never, ever using the bridge pickup soloed on either my 330 or my 660/12. I need that bit of extra oomph provided by the neck.

I find I can get most of the sounds I like just by changing where I strum. . . plenty of jangle on tap if you pick by the bridge, even in middle setting.

The neck setting on the 660/12 is fun, with OD, for "wall of sound" effects that privilege massiveness over articulation.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dean Steliga (Bitzerguy)
Junior Member
Username: Bitzerguy

Post Number: 22
Registered: 02-2005
Posted From: 66.158.149.79
Posted on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 - 12:28 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

I use my 660/12's neck p/u alone, the bridge alone on one song, but use both adjusted with the blend knob about 90% of the time (bridge tone full treble, neck tone all the way down). A little touch of the blend and you go from "wall of sound" to full jangle.

I'm with you John, on the OD-neck P/U-12 string setting. I have a great patch on my Valvetronix 120 head using the US High Gain model and the tube OD effect (drive at 10), with a 1/2 sec delay. Wall of sound with sustain forever and a neat follow up on quickly muted phrases. We play Edgar Winter's "Frankenstein" using the 660/12 and the "wall o sound" setting in place of the keyboards. Massiveness indeed. Over the top, yes. Fun forever!

...Dean
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

paul wilczynski (Jingle_jangle)
Senior Member
Username: Jingle_jangle

Post Number: 1775
Registered: 12-2004
Posted From: 63.193.9.8
Posted on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 - 02:18 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

I for one would love to hear an mp3 of THAT!!!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John McKelvy (Wormdiet)
Senior Member
Username: Wormdiet

Post Number: 604
Registered: 01-2003
Posted From: 152.22.12.56
Posted on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 - 03:36 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

My W.o.S. patch (tonelab SE) is a bit milder - just a moderate crunchy AC30TB setting with a moderate slice of the tube OD - it's probably not quite as over-the-top as yours! I've got a similar delay setting though. For some reason reverb just doesn't feel right with the Vox models.

I LOVE the AC30 models on my tonelab!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Daniel McNabb (Circles)
Junior Member
Username: Circles

Post Number: 37
Registered: 01-2005
Posted From: 68.167.165.138
Posted on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 - 03:59 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

i frequently use just the bridge pickup full-up on my 360/12V64 (with unwound pickups) played through the top boosted "brilliant" channel of my newly acquired vintage ac-30. ear plugs are useless to my treble assault!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Keith Loewy (Popster15)
New member
Username: Popster15

Post Number: 9
Registered: 06-2004
Posted From: 66.35.162.105
Posted on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 - 04:21 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Question? Does the "blend knob" on 60's Rics work the reverse from the modern "blend"? In other words, with the selector in the middle position, does turning the "blend"
couter clockwise add the neck pick-up?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John McKelvy (Wormdiet)
Senior Member
Username: Wormdiet

Post Number: 605
Registered: 01-2003
Posted From: 66.56.127.23
Posted on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 - 09:50 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Yes it does. It's just a reversed, redundant neck volume knob that does not affect the bridge pup at all. The only differences between it and the regular neck volume are a) it doesn;t cut out 100% of the volume b) it's cool looking c) it works in reverse d) it confuses a lot of people. Myself too, initially.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John McKelvy (Wormdiet)
Senior Member
Username: Wormdiet

Post Number: 606
Registered: 01-2003
Posted From: 66.56.127.23
Posted on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 - 09:51 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Yes it does. It's just a reversed, redundant neck volume knob that does not affect the bridge pup at all. The only differences between it and the regular neck volume are a) it doesn;t cut out 100% of the volume b) it's cool looking c) it works in reverse d) it confuses a lot of people. Myself too, initially.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

paul wilczynski (Jingle_jangle)
Senior Member
Username: Jingle_jangle

Post Number: 1784
Registered: 12-2004
Posted From: 63.193.9.8
Posted on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 - 10:06 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

I think John is trying to say it's redundant.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dean Steliga (Bitzerguy)
Junior Member
Username: Bitzerguy

Post Number: 24
Registered: 02-2005
Posted From: 70.49.53.188
Posted on Thursday, April 28, 2005 - 12:41 am:   Edit Post Print Post

Paul, we're working on that MP3. I'll post it once everyone is happy with it.

John, yup, maybe redundant, but I am so used to it now I don't like it not being there (as on my second fiddle fiddles, as it were). I find it handy presetting your eq with the "standard" controls then just modding it on the fly with just one light tap.

...Dean