12-saddle bridge tone question Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

The Rickenbacker Forum » Archives - Rickenbacker Guitars Jan - July 2005 » 12-saddle bridge tone question « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  ClosedClosed: New threads not accepted on this page        
Archive through May 04, 2005Peter McCormack (Adm10 05-04-05  07:52 pm
  ClosedClosed: New threads not accepted on this page        

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Steve Carsello (Steverok)
Intermediate Member
Username: Steverok

Post Number: 63
Registered: 03-2005
Posted From: 208.60.251.136
Posted on Wednesday, May 04, 2005 - 09:01 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Peter, what I did do was remove the 12-saddle bridge, and put the old 6-saddle bridge back on. I would say the overtones are still there, but less pronounced. I will experiment some more. I guess you should expect a good amount of that from any 12-string, I mean, the little strings always have some overtone, so a 12-string will have more - they make more sound. In a way, it's part of its charm, I guess.

The reason I inquired about the other bridge is that Ed Roman brags about its sturdier construction and superior tone, but who really knows ?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

paul wilczynski (Jingle_jangle)
Senior Member
Username: Jingle_jangle

Post Number: 1908
Registered: 12-2004
Posted From: 63.193.9.8
Posted on Wednesday, May 04, 2005 - 09:21 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Well, Ed also brags about these, so draw your own conclusions.
Pea-soup flame!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Peter McCormack (Admin)
Board Administrator
Username: Admin

Post Number: 3493
Registered: 04-2003
Posted From: 142.166.105.220
Posted on Wednesday, May 04, 2005 - 09:26 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Steve: I like the way you are trying to narrow down the variables. Please keep us posted.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Steve Carsello (Steverok)
Intermediate Member
Username: Steverok

Post Number: 64
Registered: 03-2005
Posted From: 209.214.18.74
Posted on Wednesday, May 04, 2005 - 09:57 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Sure Peter, I am an engineer by trade, so it's in my nature. Sometimes I get impatient and pissed off, but in this case, I feel more relaxed and curious, maybe it's part of the LOVE. When it's all said and done, I'll know as much about these things as most of you nuts !!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Steve Carsello (Steverok)
Senior Member
Username: Steverok

Post Number: 153
Registered: 03-2005
Posted From: 136.182.2.222
Posted on Tuesday, July 12, 2005 - 05:11 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Conclusion : On my 360-12, my 6-saddle bridge produces a tighter tone than the 12-saddle bridge. I recorded my guitar dry, straight into the board, with both bridges. The 12-saddle bridge seems to produce more warbly, chorus-y sort-of metallic-sounding artifacts, while both bridges produce high-pitched oscillations, especially on the B pair. Had I known, I would never have bothered with the 12-saddle bridge. A slight improvement in intonation above the 7th fret or so is not worth any loss in tone, in my estimation. I am curious if anyone else has tried this, and come to a similar conclusion ?

I plan to move the bridge plate, re-intonate the best I can with the 6-saddle, install a trapeze tail piece, and call it my 12.