Archive through May 12, 2005 Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

The Rickenbacker Forum » Archives - Rickenbacker Guitars Jan - July 2005 » Blueburst 660 Available » Archive through May 12, 2005 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bill Hughey (Stubby)
New member
Username: Stubby

Post Number: 8
Registered: 05-2005
Posted From: 24.213.88.205
Posted on Wednesday, May 11, 2005 - 11:06 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Looks great! Hard to tell from these photos though the exact colour of the pickguard.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Williams (Jwilli)
Senior Member
Username: Jwilli

Post Number: 908
Registered: 04-2002
Posted From: 24.88.72.49
Posted on Wednesday, May 11, 2005 - 11:16 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Vintage Gold guards.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dean Mentjes (Dean712)
Senior Member
Username: Dean712

Post Number: 266
Registered: 01-2005
Posted From: 216.141.136.42
Posted on Wednesday, May 11, 2005 - 11:18 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

It's a gold pickguard and gold TRC.

That is a super beautiful guitar.

I bought my 660/12 from Russ there at Classic Axe a couple of months ago. Great experience, very much recommended.

If that guitar is hanging there for long, I'll be stunned.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Nick St. Hilaire (Nick_st_hilaire)
New member
Username: Nick_st_hilaire

Post Number: 6
Registered: 03-2005
Posted From: 71.100.16.198
Posted on Wednesday, May 11, 2005 - 11:54 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Flamey maple/gold pick-guards turn my crank too.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Steve Cooper (Atomic_punk)
Senior Member
Username: Atomic_punk

Post Number: 1687
Registered: 09-2003
Posted From: 68.248.8.90
Posted on Thursday, May 12, 2005 - 12:02 am:   Edit Post Print Post

Oh my...if my 4003 BBR has that kind of flame on the top, I am going to be in LOVE. That looks flat-out incredible!!!! Supposedly it should be here within 3 weeks!!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

R. C. Bengston (Rcbengston)
Senior Member
Username: Rcbengston

Post Number: 256
Registered: 04-2002
Posted From: 216.201.206.122
Posted on Thursday, May 12, 2005 - 06:49 am:   Edit Post Print Post

I see only one problem with that 660/12 BBR.


I'm a lefty and it's not.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Robert Callaghan (Red_rob)
Senior Member
Username: Red_rob

Post Number: 103
Registered: 02-2005
Posted From: 194.74.48.4
Posted on Thursday, May 12, 2005 - 07:42 am:   Edit Post Print Post

more more more!!

Totally insatiable!

the 381 is gonna look amazing....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Peter McCormack (Admin)
Board Administrator
Username: Admin

Post Number: 3539
Registered: 04-2003
Posted From: 142.166.105.220
Posted on Thursday, May 12, 2005 - 08:34 am:   Edit Post Print Post

Thanks for theses photos Ron. You have done us all a great service. These photos reveal how difficult it might be to capture the blueburst finish. Differing amounts of light can completely change the appearance of an instrument.

My memory from following Mary Chapin-Carpenter's blueburst for years has always been that the blueburst was applied a bit like the fireglo, going from dark on the edges to almost natural in the center of the instrument. Of course lighting comes into play here and so I went back to the RIC site to see the photos of Mary's guitars. I have cropped the photo below and it seems to be close to my memory of her first blueburst.

Mary Chapin-Carpenter's Blueburst

2005 Blueburst finish

This recent blueburst (above) has the same dark to light characteristic of a burst but is less light in the center. I am wondering if this is an individual difference in the spraying of the instrument or if it is more typical of the average blueburst leaving the factory today.

I find both finishes very appealing and, before comparing them side by side, leaned toward Mary's finish as it is a little more three-dimensional and has an appearance closer to the fireglo shading. It might be argued, however, that Mary's is too faint that that the 2005 Blueburst is a more even tone. I have offered Ron's photo above for the purpose of comparison.

As I consider both of these photos now, I can't decide which one I like best.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John McKelvy (Wormdiet)
Senior Member
Username: Wormdiet

Post Number: 620
Registered: 01-2003
Posted From: 152.22.12.56
Posted on Thursday, May 12, 2005 - 08:50 am:   Edit Post Print Post

Wow! Nice!

Methinks a flamy 381 would be the absolute best for showing off this finish. (Or a flamy 4005, but we all know that's a fantasy)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ron Sodano (Bosco64)
Senior Member
Username: Bosco64

Post Number: 137
Registered: 06-2003
Posted From: 198.246.80.254
Posted on Thursday, May 12, 2005 - 09:35 am:   Edit Post Print Post

Thanks, Peter. Coming from you, that's a wonderful compliment. I'm with you, I don't know which Blueburst finish I like the best! In person, the blue is definitely darker around the edges of the instrument. The checkered binding with the gold pickguards and nameplate really set it off. As Dean said earlier, I would be shocked if it hung around the store for long.