Ric 450's Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

The Rickenbacker Forum » Archives - Rickenbacker Guitars Jan - July 2005 » Ric 450's « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Len Hruszowy (Fab4)
New member
Username: Fab4

Post Number: 11
Registered: 03-2005
Posted From: 209.82.37.19
Posted on Thursday, June 09, 2005 - 02:10 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Just a general question which I should probably know but don't. Is the body thickness different on Ric 450-12's than on the 6 string 450's?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Randy Zimmerman (Randyz)
Senior Member
Username: Randyz

Post Number: 105
Registered: 10-2004
Posted From: 216.138.116.82
Posted on Thursday, June 09, 2005 - 02:23 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

I think they are exactly the same. My '66 450/12 and my '64 ES-16 have the same body thickness. I've never measured them but they feel the same.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Len Hruszowy (Fab4)
New member
Username: Fab4

Post Number: 12
Registered: 03-2005
Posted From: 209.82.37.19
Posted on Thursday, June 09, 2005 - 03:54 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Interesting I have a 1967 and a 1978 Ric 450-12 and they both have the same body thickness. I also have a very early 1960's Ric 450-6 that is 1.5 times thicker than the 12 string 450's. It is quite noticeably thicker than the 12 strings. The 6 string 450 also has the old head stock logo (oblong metal with raised letters )
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Peter McCormack (Admin)
Board Administrator
Username: Admin

Post Number: 3750
Registered: 04-2003
Posted From: 142.166.105.220
Posted on Thursday, June 09, 2005 - 04:13 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Len: Great observation. While you are at it, why not measure the thickeness of your guitars and post the information here.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Williams (Jwilli)
Senior Member
Username: Jwilli

Post Number: 970
Registered: 04-2002
Posted From: 24.168.222.248
Posted on Thursday, June 09, 2005 - 05:42 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Len, yours is most likely a '60 450. They were thicker in '60 than in '61, '62, etc.....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Simmons (Leftybass)
Senior Member
Username: Leftybass

Post Number: 1009
Registered: 04-2002
Posted From: 69.161.23.82
Posted on Thursday, June 09, 2005 - 05:50 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

I had a '61 that had the thin body, it was just like the one JWilli has. I'm thinking the cutoff for the thick-body 450 was early 1961, but it could have been a bit earlier. I miss that guitar...<sniff> :-(
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Williams (Jwilli)
Senior Member
Username: Jwilli

Post Number: 973
Registered: 04-2002
Posted From: 24.168.222.248
Posted on Thursday, June 09, 2005 - 08:24 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Thats ok Leftybass, I have two '60 450s. You know that you can play them anytime. :-0
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Simmons (Leftybass)
Senior Member
Username: Leftybass

Post Number: 1010
Registered: 04-2002
Posted From: 68.232.67.156
Posted on Thursday, June 09, 2005 - 09:23 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

...my guitars are your guitars too, pal. You'll just have to play lefty with some of them!!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Len Hruszowy (Fab4)
New member
Username: Fab4

Post Number: 13
Registered: 03-2005
Posted From: 24.156.71.227
Posted on Thursday, June 09, 2005 - 11:17 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Thanks for the info. I did the measurements and the 12 string Ric 450 is approx. 1 1/4" thick and the 6 string Ric 450 is just under 1 3/4" thick.

I can't really make out the serial number on the bridge plate on the 6 string but looks like 4G 873A which according to the Ric web site dates it as a 400 Series model manufactured in 1958?

Ric Comparison
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Peter McCormack (Admin)
Board Administrator
Username: Admin

Post Number: 3753
Registered: 04-2003
Posted From: 142.166.105.220
Posted on Thursday, June 09, 2005 - 11:19 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Nice work. Thanks Len.