Archive through June 18, 2005 Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

The Rickenbacker Forum » Archives - Rickenbacker Guitars Jan - July 2005 » The plot thickens...620 v 360 » Archive through June 18, 2005 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mark Revel (Mark_revel)
New member
Username: Mark_revel

Post Number: 6
Registered: 06-2005
Posted From: 68.216.187.22
Posted on Friday, June 17, 2005 - 06:12 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

I found out the 360 is within my budget too...how do they sound in comparison?

A lot of reviews said these Rics are not suitable for solos or lead playing.

Is this true?

Help!

I'm gonna go play some tomorrow.

Mark
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Anthony Carey (Tony_carey)
Senior Member
Username: Tony_carey

Post Number: 746
Registered: 10-2004
Posted From: 81.156.250.164
Posted on Friday, June 17, 2005 - 09:57 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Mark, in a word....RUBBISH!

Any one who writes that sort of stuff should be forced to eat their own pencils, because they obviously know nothing about Rics. I only play Rics (1997, 360V64-12, 330's) & I solo madly on them & they sound GREAT.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gary Clauson (Doctorwho)
Senior Member
Username: Doctorwho

Post Number: 1542
Registered: 06-2002
Posted From: 64.168.183.122
Posted on Friday, June 17, 2005 - 11:00 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Mark, listen to some R.E.M. - Peter Buck uses a 360 in much of the leads (and rhythm) tracks. I don't think many would find his leads "unsuitable"!

Also, think about the 12-string leads in any of the Byrds' songs: if a 360 were unsuitable, a 370/12 most certainly be unsuitable, too.

As Tony said, "RUBBISH!"
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John McKelvy (Wormdiet)
Senior Member
Username: Wormdiet

Post Number: 641
Registered: 01-2003
Posted From: 66.56.127.42
Posted on Friday, June 17, 2005 - 11:57 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

If you are reading the reviews over at harmony central, take-'em with a grain of salt on the whole "lead" thing.

Carrie Brownstein of Sleater-Kinney has used a 330 on several albums. It snarls and hisses as well as anything, if you need it to.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

danhamilton (Qmoder)
Senior Member
Username: Qmoder

Post Number: 178
Registered: 12-2003
Posted From: 216.180.65.210
Posted on Saturday, June 18, 2005 - 12:23 am:   Edit Post Print Post

Nope it can be done. Be patient when you first get it. It requires a time period to get used to it and the guitar to break in.
Then bam your there and man does it sound good.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

paul wilczynski (Jingle_jangle)
Senior Member
Username: Jingle_jangle

Post Number: 2524
Registered: 12-2004
Posted From: 67.180.37.56
Posted on Saturday, June 18, 2005 - 01:17 am:   Edit Post Print Post

Don't forget that mystical blend knob. It is the key to a range of unique voicings!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Noel Christian Riddell (Longhouse)
Senior Member
Username: Longhouse

Post Number: 282
Registered: 04-2003
Posted From: 68.217.164.47
Posted on Saturday, June 18, 2005 - 01:51 am:   Edit Post Print Post

Rics are not Strats or Les Pauls ---- but more importantly THOSE GUITARS ARE NOT RICKENBACKERS -and they cannot do what Rics do. Or look as good while they're doing it.

Unless you're stictly a metal player or traditional jazzbo, a Ric CAN be your sole (or main) guitar.

Noel
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kent Fletcher (Brammy)
Senior Member
Username: Brammy

Post Number: 251
Registered: 04-2005
Posted From: 24.25.246.85
Posted on Saturday, June 18, 2005 - 02:28 am:   Edit Post Print Post

yup.... soul guitar
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mark Revel (Mark_revel)
New member
Username: Mark_revel

Post Number: 7
Registered: 06-2005
Posted From: 157.127.124.134
Posted on Saturday, June 18, 2005 - 10:36 am:   Edit Post Print Post

Cool! After I get outta work, I'm heading to KC to play a 620, 330, & 360. I will be playing blues & Christian praise tunes. I do solo quite a bit as well. I'll post tomorrow on what I gleaned &/or bought!
Is there a playing difference between 330s & 360s? Or 620s for that matter as they all have the same neck dimensions?

Thanks!

Mark
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Peter McCormack (Admin)
Board Administrator
Username: Admin

Post Number: 3824
Registered: 04-2003
Posted From: 142.166.105.230
Posted on Saturday, June 18, 2005 - 12:05 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Mark: Each of these instruments has a different body feel and, to my way of thinking, that plays a role in performance.

The 620 is more compact while the bodies of the 330 and 360 are much larger in comparison.

I don't think it is possible for me to ignore the body size even though necks may be identical. Also, the feel of the binding is also a factor.

While most people can adapt to most things, there is no substitute for trying out an instrument before you buy it.