Archive through June 24, 2005 Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

The Rickenbacker Forum » Archives - Rickenbacker Guitars Jan - July 2005 » In praise of Hi-Gains » Archive through June 24, 2005 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Larry Carroll (Eggman)
New member
Username: Eggman

Post Number: 19
Registered: 06-2005
Posted From: 65.81.240.202
Posted on Thursday, June 23, 2005 - 06:17 am:   Edit Post Print Post

Howdy,

I'll admit that it's been almost 20 years since I sold my little black 320 (w/ factory "Toasters" and gold pickguard,truss rod cover). In the 2 years I owned it I gigged with it regularly and even used it for lead guitar in a C&W group!
Since then I've owned several 330's with the standard Hi-Gains and must say that I prefer the Hi-Gains. I'm a vintage "purist" kind of guy, trust me. The "Toasters" look SO cool and have AlNiCo magnets to boot, no argument.
My little 320 (Toasters) had a certain...brittle tone and lacked for mids compared to the Hi-Gains. I'll freely admit that I could absolutely nail those CCR tones with that little 320 :-) I found it difficult to get the right degree of treble: either too much or not enough.
This is not to impugn "Toaster Top" p/u's. Many of my favorite songs from the 60's were recorded on Rickenbackers with "Toaster Tops"! I prefer Hi-Gains for my 6-strings. What about ya'll?
BTW: I may well try "Toaster Tops" on my JG 620-12 string in the near future.

Respectfully,
Eggman
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Peter McCormack (Admin)
Board Administrator
Username: Admin

Post Number: 3909
Registered: 04-2003
Posted From: 142.166.105.230
Posted on Thursday, June 23, 2005 - 07:46 am:   Edit Post Print Post

Your point is well taken Larry. Each of these pickups has its strong points and limitations depending on playing style and genre. Recall that Fogerty got his classic sound with a non-stock humbucker in the bridge position.

I have experimented with toasters, humbuckers and high gains and enjoy the sound of all of them. In fact, my Model 350 has one of each installed.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Anthony Carey (Tony_carey)
Senior Member
Username: Tony_carey

Post Number: 771
Registered: 10-2004
Posted From: 81.157.58.104
Posted on Thursday, June 23, 2005 - 08:09 am:   Edit Post Print Post

Larry, I totaly agree with you with regard to the 7.4 scatterwounds, but the older toasters can sometimes be hotter than hi-gains (my '92 1997 &'91 360V64-12 for instance) & have all the warmth & bottom end that you (& I) are looking for.

I have always maintained hi-gains with 24 fret & toasters with 21 fret, but I would be very interested to hear the hot toasters in a 24 fret, for a side by side comparison!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Robert Callaghan (Red_rob)
Senior Member
Username: Red_rob

Post Number: 133
Registered: 02-2005
Posted From: 194.74.48.4
Posted on Thursday, June 23, 2005 - 10:37 am:   Edit Post Print Post

You guys are killin me!

My next Rickenbacker (scheduled to be born this winter) is going to be a JG 360/12. That much I know. I have no idea whether I'll get a standard high gain model or Carl Wilson with toasters.

Both by current Rics are toaster models and I KNOW I should go for something different, but man - I just love toasters and 21 frets! I think I'm losing my mind!!!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kent Fletcher (Brammy)
Senior Member
Username: Brammy

Post Number: 280
Registered: 04-2005
Posted From: 128.171.162.77
Posted on Thursday, June 23, 2005 - 04:48 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

>>>I have no idea whether I'll get a standard high gain model or Carl Wilson with toasters.

Robert... buddy... will all due respect and empathy, how in the world did you order a 360/12 without knowing exactly what you'll be getting? Actually, since the CW was a limited edition, I think its likely you will be getting a 24 fret model with hi-gains.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

danhamilton (Qmoder)
Senior Member
Username: Qmoder

Post Number: 192
Registered: 12-2003
Posted From: 216.180.66.82
Posted on Thursday, June 23, 2005 - 11:26 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

I agree Larry, I love the sound of my Highgains on my 360/6. But if I ever get a 370/12 I think that the toasters would be cool.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kent Fletcher (Brammy)
Senior Member
Username: Brammy

Post Number: 287
Registered: 04-2005
Posted From: 128.171.162.77
Posted on Thursday, June 23, 2005 - 11:35 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

I have 2 360's both with hi-gains.... one is a 1980 and the other an '88 refinished tuxedo model. My bandmates insist that the tuxedo sounds much better but I cant honestly say I can hear the diffefernce. One of the differences in a CW compared to a regular 360 is a "Special thin top for increased acoustic performance". Does anyone know whether the tuxedo 360 has a similar thin top?

if I can find a jetglo CW for not too much $ I'll jump at it. (I know, I know... dream on)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

David Chase Lopes (360dave660)
Senior Member
Username: 360dave660

Post Number: 143
Registered: 04-2002
Posted From: 80.9.140.217
Posted on Friday, June 24, 2005 - 09:01 am:   Edit Post Print Post

I have both a 360-6 w/ high gains and a cw-6. While the cw may overall have a bigger sixties vibe, i really think it has more to do with the thinness of the top than the p/ups. I have two rics with toasters and two with high gains. I really like them both and do not think that the hi gains are that dramatically different to toasters. Also, the hi-gains are about 35 yrs old in design, so kind of vintage in their own right. Also, if hi-gains really diminished from ric's "signature sound", why would have the company changed the pickups ? also, more than once, Mr. Hall has mentioned that the real difference in guitar sound comes from how the guitar neck is attached to the body. Any thoughts ?

peace,
dave
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kent Fletcher (Brammy)
Senior Member
Username: Brammy

Post Number: 288
Registered: 04-2005
Posted From: 128.171.162.77
Posted on Friday, June 24, 2005 - 05:12 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Dave... good comments. As someone who has both flavors of PUs on hand your evaluation is real important.... especially to me who is seriously thinking of a CW 360/6.

Very interesting that you dont think that the hi gains sound dramatically different to toasters and that you think the difference in sound has more to do with the thinness of the top.

I hadn't heard about what John said re how the guitar neck is attached to the body... I suppose he's not so much comparing one Ric to another but more comparing Ricenbackers to guitars with a simple bolt on neck like a (dare I use the F-word?) Fender. I never considered how that would affect the sound, but it sure makes a lot of sense, especially for a semi-hollowbody guitar.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Anthony Carey (Tony_carey)
Senior Member
Username: Tony_carey

Post Number: 775
Registered: 10-2004
Posted From: 81.157.59.217
Posted on Friday, June 24, 2005 - 08:35 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Dave, I hear what you say, but I think that it depends on how you use them....clean or overdriven. I have hi-gains & the old hot toasters, which do not sound disimilar....but the 7.4's sound totaly different when overdriven.....not for me, I've just sold my CW!

I play predominantly rock & as a result, use overdrive in fair quantities. A 7.4 has a horrible raspiness about it when treated with anything but the most mildest overdrive, whilst the older toasters & hi-gains overdrive very nicely indeed.

I admit that when played cleanly, the CW was OK....I just don't play clean very often....