Proof that pictures are misleading

Log Out | Topics | Search Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Author Message   Bob Belloff (Belloff) Senior Member Username: Belloff Post Number: 435 Registered: 02-2004 Posted From: 67.85.191.150 Posted on Sunday, July 03, 2005 - 09:34 am:    Look at this picture, which appears to be a "clownglo". The guitar in this picture is a 1967 336/12.   Bob Belloff (Belloff) Senior Member Username: Belloff Post Number: 436 Registered: 02-2004 Posted From: 67.85.191.150 Posted on Sunday, July 03, 2005 - 09:36 am:      john biscuti (Nyrkickazz1) Senior Member Username: Nyrkickazz1 Post Number: 188 Registered: 01-2005 Posted From: 68.174.21.72 Posted on Sunday, July 03, 2005 - 02:58 pm:    330 Fireglos very often photograph like that.   Anthony Carey (Tony_carey) Senior Member Username: Tony_carey Post Number: 813 Registered: 10-2004 Posted From: 81.157.57.115 Posted on Sunday, July 03, 2005 - 06:41 pm:    Bob, you know that I'm very choosey about my FG colour (can't wait to get your 330-12) & pics like that make it very hard to decide if you like it or not. Your right John, they do photo like that very often. There is an '80's 330 on ebay now that I am interested in, but the pic is not too far removed from above & when you're as choosey about FG as I am, it makes the difference wheather you pull the trigger or not.   Robert Callaghan (Red_rob) Senior Member Username: Red_rob Post Number: 146 Registered: 02-2005 Posted From: 194.74.48.4 Posted on Tuesday, July 05, 2005 - 10:26 am:    Sorry guys, what do you mean by "Clownglo"? Are you referring to the apparent lack of smooth gradient between the red and the natural?