12-string Rics... 21 or 24? Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

The Rickenbacker Forum » Archives - Rickenbacker Guitars Jan - July 2005 » 12-string Rics... 21 or 24? « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kent Fletcher (Brammy)
Senior Member
Username: Brammy

Post Number: 446
Registered: 04-2005
Posted From: 24.25.246.85
Posted on Wednesday, July 20, 2005 - 12:57 am:   Edit Post Print Post

When it comes to the feel/playability of Ric 12-strings, is there a big difference between 21 frets and 24 frets?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jeffrey Scott (Jps)
Senior Member
Username: Jps

Post Number: 3667
Registered: 02-2003
Posted From: 65.43.179.213
Posted on Wednesday, July 20, 2005 - 09:23 am:   Edit Post Print Post

The big difference is in the nut width of the necks. I prefer the wider neck on my 660/12; I found the narrower neck difficult to play chords on.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Anthony Carey (Tony_carey)
Senior Member
Username: Tony_carey

Post Number: 854
Registered: 10-2004
Posted From: 81.157.57.41
Posted on Wednesday, July 20, 2005 - 09:38 am:   Edit Post Print Post

The nut width is only different on the 660. If you are looking at 360V64's, 350V63's, 620's, Carl Wilsons etc, then the nut width is the same as the 6 string 330/360/s.

I say get both, a 21 fret with toasters & 24 fret with hi-gains!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Peter McCormack (Admin)
Board Administrator
Username: Admin

Post Number: 4281
Registered: 04-2003
Posted From: 142.166.105.230
Posted on Wednesday, July 20, 2005 - 09:54 am:   Edit Post Print Post

While not wanting to hijack the intent of this thread, I would add that a 24 fret with a high gain in the neck and a hot toaster (11-12 KOhm) in the bridge is also an option to allow for a bit more jangle and sufficient output. This gives you a nice balance of lows and highs that provides for a very versatile tonality.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Graham Griffiths (8mileshigh)
Senior Member
Username: 8mileshigh

Post Number: 356
Registered: 11-2003
Posted From: 82.163.190.63
Posted on Wednesday, July 20, 2005 - 10:08 am:   Edit Post Print Post

21 fret looks better - more space between the pick ups, just more aesthetically pleasing (to my eye anyway).
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kent Fletcher (Brammy)
Senior Member
Username: Brammy

Post Number: 452
Registered: 04-2005
Posted From: 24.25.246.85
Posted on Wednesday, July 20, 2005 - 06:32 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

>>>> a high gain in the neck and a hot toaster (11-12 KOhm) in the bridge

ya... the question of toasters and possible combo with hi-gains seems to be a big one... and one that I'm very interested in.

Peter, have you ever tried reversing that (putting the hi-gain at the neck and the toaster at the bridge) ? .... kinda like a counterintuitive counterbalance if that makes any sense.

(as for the wider nut width of a 660... thanks, I didn't know that.)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Graham Twibell (Arbiter)
New member
Username: Arbiter

Post Number: 16
Registered: 04-2005
Posted From: 69.204.173.108
Posted on Wednesday, July 27, 2005 - 11:09 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

i prefer 24 cause i like to downtune and use a capo but still have 22.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Peter McCormack (Admin)
Board Administrator
Username: Admin

Post Number: 4369
Registered: 04-2003
Posted From: 142.166.105.230
Posted on Wednesday, July 27, 2005 - 11:13 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Yes Brammy I have with good results on a 24 fret model.