Reproduction Pre-1974 Aluminum Tailpiece / Bridge

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

dgwguitars
New member
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 2:28 am
Contact:

Reproduction Pre-1974 Aluminum Tailpiece / Bridge

Post by dgwguitars »

For those of you who have not seen my post on the "Rickenbacker Guitars and Basses" Facebook page, after having reproduction aluminum saddles made for the pre-1974 sandcast aluminum bass bridges, I've been asked about the potential for having the aluminum tailpieces and bridges reproduced. Before looking into it with the same CNC shop, I wanted to see what the interest might be, either for restoration purposes or for replacement of the zinc tailpieces and bridges. At this point, I do not know what the cost might be, but if there is sufficient interest, I'll pursue it further. Please note that this is just an initial inquiry, and it pending potential legal matters, such as trademark / patent infringement issues.
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Re: Reproduction Pre-1974 Aluminum Tailpiece / Bridge

Post by rictified »

I wouldn't need one at this point but I think it would be welcomed.
User avatar
wim
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1486
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 1:37 am

Re: Reproduction Pre-1974 Aluminum Tailpiece / Bridge

Post by wim »

This would be more of a casting job rather than a CNC job.
I could cast items that size (lost wax casting) but it would probably be a trademark infringement of some sort.
dgwguitars
New member
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 2:28 am
Contact:

Re: Reproduction Pre-1974 Aluminum Tailpiece / Bridge

Post by dgwguitars »

wim wrote:This would be more of a casting job rather than a CNC job.
I could cast items that size (lost wax casting) but it would probably be a trademark infringement of some sort.
To be a true replica, you're correct. The result likely wouldn't be visibly distinguishable from the original, except for the underside of both the tailpiece and bridge and inside the tailpiece recess for the bridge.
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6315
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: Reproduction Pre-1974 Aluminum Tailpiece / Bridge

Post by teeder »

Larry, FIIW, I looked into doing this a few years back. Even had quotes on making the pattern and the piece price for casting. I was going to laser-scan one of my originals for the pattern. The mold would make 6 at a time. I asked Mr Hall about doing this and was shot down. Maybe you will have more luck.
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Reproduction Pre-1974 Aluminum Tailpiece / Bridge

Post by aceonbass »

I remember John saying no to reproducing the cast tailpiece based on some sort of supposed infringement, but since it's not shaped exactly like the current zinc part, and the AllParts and HipShot bridges are closer to the current part as well, I don't see a real issue. Perhaps John will join in this discussion, or send me a PM as he's done in the past, but since aftermarket replacement parts are out there copying the footprint of 4000 series tailpieces with apparent impunity, I don't see any enforceable infringement issues. There are a few design flaws in the current part there were carried over from the cast part, which I'd like to see addressed, and I think a new cast replacement should incorporate a current design RIC bridge due to the limited saddle travel in the old one.
User avatar
Kopfjaeger
Advanced Member
Posts: 1908
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 8:49 am

Re: Reproduction Pre-1974 Aluminum Tailpiece / Bridge

Post by Kopfjaeger »

Perhaps something lie this??
1619240_1092128730813230_2739321616300756143_n.jpg
Vintage/Classic Rickenbacker Enthusiast!
1972 4001 Jetglo
1973 4001 Burgundyglo
2011 4003 Jetglo
1986 4003 Shadow
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2823
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: Reproduction Pre-1974 Aluminum Tailpiece / Bridge

Post by thx1955 »

I'm in, I'd be up for potentially 2, possibly 3
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
User avatar
chefothefuture
Advanced Member
Posts: 1886
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Reproduction Pre-1974 Aluminum Tailpiece / Bridge

Post by chefothefuture »

A deeper bridge well would be a great thing for basses with neck lift :-)
If that could be done I'd be down for a couple...
User avatar
DriftSpace
Member
Posts: 458
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Reproduction Pre-1974 Aluminum Tailpiece / Bridge

Post by DriftSpace »

I'd be interested, if the price were right, and even more if there was an option to get this with the bridge and saddles. I'd prefer CNC over sand-cast, as it would keep the cost down.

My interest would increase even more if we had the option to receive this in different finishes, as in chrome, and black; if all that were anodized instead of powder-coated: even better. It'd be great if I could just replace all my metal parts with aluminum, actually ... and a toothless version would also pique my interest.

(Yes, I realize this isn't "period correct," and that the sand-cast RIC tail never came in black, but that doesn't matter to me personally.)
Kopfjaeger wrote:Perhaps something lie this??
1619240_1092128730813230_2739321616300756143_n.jpg
Please tell us more about what this is and from whence it came; it's nice looking.
Last edited by DriftSpace on Wed Feb 24, 2016 3:29 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
DriftSpace
Member
Posts: 458
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Reproduction Pre-1974 Aluminum Tailpiece / Bridge

Post by DriftSpace »

chefothefuture wrote:A deeper bridge well would be a great thing for basses with neck lift :-)
If that could be done I'd be down for a couple...
I think the more ideas like this -- the not "period correct" -- which are entertained: the further we get from legal issues. I'd support John's request as well; you can't really go wrong with more adjustment options.
User avatar
Kiddwad57
Intermediate Member
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:59 pm

Re: Reproduction Pre-1974 Aluminum Tailpiece / Bridge

Post by Kiddwad57 »

Kopfjaeger wrote:Perhaps something lie this??
1619240_1092128730813230_2739321616300756143_n.jpg
It looks better than the hipshot to me. I'm curious about any details too. Do you know what are the brass tubes on either side are for?
Don't let democracy end democracy.
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Reproduction Pre-1974 Aluminum Tailpiece / Bridge

Post by aceonbass »

Sepp.....Where did you get that? I like the brass saddles, but I'm not a fan of lock down saddles though. What's goin' on with the mute area?
User avatar
Kopfjaeger
Advanced Member
Posts: 1908
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 8:49 am

Re: Reproduction Pre-1974 Aluminum Tailpiece / Bridge

Post by Kopfjaeger »

OK, several months ago I was directed to the Facebook page of a South American luthier. How I actually got there, is can't remember. I saw a the foto I posted here and was curious. I sent several messages asking for more details about the tailpiece but never heard back. either he speaks no English or he isn't interested in selling or talking about it. Sadly I have no details. :(

Sepp
1619240_1092128730813230_2739321616300756143_n.jpg
Vintage/Classic Rickenbacker Enthusiast!
1972 4001 Jetglo
1973 4001 Burgundyglo
2011 4003 Jetglo
1986 4003 Shadow
User avatar
Kopfjaeger
Advanced Member
Posts: 1908
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 8:49 am

Re: Reproduction Pre-1974 Aluminum Tailpiece / Bridge

Post by Kopfjaeger »

Another view
4003 tailpiece.jpg
Vintage/Classic Rickenbacker Enthusiast!
1972 4001 Jetglo
1973 4001 Burgundyglo
2011 4003 Jetglo
1986 4003 Shadow
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”