
is this for real 350 bass?
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Re: is this for real 350 bass?
i dident want to open up a can of worms. i just found the pic's of this bass on the internet and was looking for info on it 

09 360/6 fireglo. 09 360/12 fireglo. A tele a strat and a VOX
- sloop_john_b
- Rick-a-holic
- Posts: 13843
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am
Re: is this for real 350 bass?
Love the features and trim and all, but the body shape looks a bit disproportionate to me.
Electronics by Rick Turner IIRC.
Electronics by Rick Turner IIRC.
Re: is this for real 350 bass?
you shouldn't feel that way...it's not a can of worms, just some opinions are not appreciated that's all....don't feel like you have started something...you were just looking at something you thought was cool....
who said egg shells???
who said egg shells???
Re: is this for real 350 bass?
I don't see any egg shells.
“We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” - Albert Einstein
"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother" - Albert Einstein
"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother" - Albert Einstein
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: is this for real 350 bass?
...yet. This was an unauthorized construction, as was its partner.
It is disproportionate to my eye--the lower bout is too bulbous top-to-bottom, and the neck too long for the body mass. The neck and strings appear to be shifted too far over to the treble side, although they are not, geometrically speaking; it's a visual perception thing that would need to be corrected.
IF the bass ever went into production, which it probably wouldn't.
Jaymi, the reason this topic got ugly before had to do with varying "opinions" on issues of intellectual property (sound familiar?) when the only "opinion" that's valid is that of a court of law. Anytime the topic is discussed, there's a chance that tempers will fray and verbal AK-47s will be unleashed.
It is disproportionate to my eye--the lower bout is too bulbous top-to-bottom, and the neck too long for the body mass. The neck and strings appear to be shifted too far over to the treble side, although they are not, geometrically speaking; it's a visual perception thing that would need to be corrected.
IF the bass ever went into production, which it probably wouldn't.
Jaymi, the reason this topic got ugly before had to do with varying "opinions" on issues of intellectual property (sound familiar?) when the only "opinion" that's valid is that of a court of law. Anytime the topic is discussed, there's a chance that tempers will fray and verbal AK-47s will be unleashed.
Re: is this for real 350 bass?
What? When did I say I like it? I think it's gross.thinneckrick wrote:Saying you like it is the problem Wes.
Re: is this for real 350 bass?
thinneckrick wrote:Saying you like it is the problem Wes. So do i but.....then .....you start to hear the eggshells crunching ....and...see visions of padlocks ......and.... complete threads start missing......It is a sweety though.. Must have had it made before the heroin addiction got to great as im sure she was'nt cheap
brian, here is where the eggshells were mentioned
- thinneckrick
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:59 am
- Contact:
Re: is this for real 350 bass?
I stand corrected Wes
I think its pretty slick

Re: is this for real 350 bass?
It's not Fireglo, I'm immune ... !!
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
Re: is this for real 350 bass?
thx1955 wrote:It's not Fireglo, I'm immune ... !!
There is a way to fix that!!!!! Where's my paint gun???
- thinneckrick
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:59 am
- Contact:
Re: is this for real 350 bass?
[quote="jingle_jangle"]So there shouldnt be a problem right ? It would seem to me that unless its a dead nuts copy . No harm no foul . Besides we all know what a real rick looks and feels like .
It is disproportionate to my eye--the lower bout is too bulbous top-to-bottom, and the neck too long for the body mass. The neck and strings appear to be shifted too far over to the treble side, although they are not, geometrically speaking; it's a visual perception thing that would need to be corrected
It is disproportionate to my eye--the lower bout is too bulbous top-to-bottom, and the neck too long for the body mass. The neck and strings appear to be shifted too far over to the treble side, although they are not, geometrically speaking; it's a visual perception thing that would need to be corrected
Re: is this for real 350 bass?
So, Paul...Ric never built it?
Re: is this for real 350 bass?
No. They did not. But of course I am not Paul.JakeK wrote:So, Paul...Ric never built it?

“We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” - Albert Einstein
"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother" - Albert Einstein
"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother" - Albert Einstein
- thinneckrick
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:59 am
- Contact:
Re: is this for real 350 bass?
heres somemore eggshells. eggshells, eggshells,eggshells.......
Re: is this for real 350 bass?
Oh, those eggshells are from me...
The world's largest omlet can't prepare itself!
The world's largest omlet can't prepare itself!
