is this for real 350 bass?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
hjarnett
Intermediate Member
Posts: 723
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:01 pm

Re: is this for real 350 bass?

Post by hjarnett »

i dident want to open up a can of worms. i just found the pic's of this bass on the internet and was looking for info on it :?
09 360/6 fireglo. 09 360/12 fireglo. A tele a strat and a VOX
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: is this for real 350 bass?

Post by sloop_john_b »

Love the features and trim and all, but the body shape looks a bit disproportionate to me.

Electronics by Rick Turner IIRC.
User avatar
jaymi
Advanced Member
Posts: 2332
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: is this for real 350 bass?

Post by jaymi »

you shouldn't feel that way...it's not a can of worms, just some opinions are not appreciated that's all....don't feel like you have started something...you were just looking at something you thought was cool....

who said egg shells???
User avatar
winston
Membership Admin
Posts: 11010
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 am

Re: is this for real 350 bass?

Post by winston »

I don't see any egg shells.
“We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” - Albert Einstein

"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother" - Albert Einstein
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: is this for real 350 bass?

Post by jingle_jangle »

...yet. This was an unauthorized construction, as was its partner.

It is disproportionate to my eye--the lower bout is too bulbous top-to-bottom, and the neck too long for the body mass. The neck and strings appear to be shifted too far over to the treble side, although they are not, geometrically speaking; it's a visual perception thing that would need to be corrected.

IF the bass ever went into production, which it probably wouldn't.

Jaymi, the reason this topic got ugly before had to do with varying "opinions" on issues of intellectual property (sound familiar?) when the only "opinion" that's valid is that of a court of law. Anytime the topic is discussed, there's a chance that tempers will fray and verbal AK-47s will be unleashed.
User avatar
1965
Advanced Member
Posts: 1607
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:01 pm

Re: is this for real 350 bass?

Post by 1965 »

thinneckrick wrote:Saying you like it is the problem Wes.
What? When did I say I like it? I think it's gross.
User avatar
jaymi
Advanced Member
Posts: 2332
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: is this for real 350 bass?

Post by jaymi »

thinneckrick wrote:Saying you like it is the problem Wes. So do i but.....then .....you start to hear the eggshells crunching ....and...see visions of padlocks ......and.... complete threads start missing......It is a sweety though.. Must have had it made before the heroin addiction got to great as im sure she was'nt cheap :D

brian, here is where the eggshells were mentioned
User avatar
thinneckrick
Intermediate Member
Posts: 573
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:59 am
Contact:

Re: is this for real 350 bass?

Post by thinneckrick »

I stand corrected Wes :D I think its pretty slick
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: is this for real 350 bass?

Post by thx1955 »

It's not Fireglo, I'm immune ... !!
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
User avatar
jaymi
Advanced Member
Posts: 2332
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: is this for real 350 bass?

Post by jaymi »

thx1955 wrote:It's not Fireglo, I'm immune ... !!

There is a way to fix that!!!!! Where's my paint gun???
User avatar
thinneckrick
Intermediate Member
Posts: 573
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:59 am
Contact:

Re: is this for real 350 bass?

Post by thinneckrick »

[quote="jingle_jangle"]So there shouldnt be a problem right ? It would seem to me that unless its a dead nuts copy . No harm no foul . Besides we all know what a real rick looks and feels like .

It is disproportionate to my eye--the lower bout is too bulbous top-to-bottom, and the neck too long for the body mass. The neck and strings appear to be shifted too far over to the treble side, although they are not, geometrically speaking; it's a visual perception thing that would need to be corrected
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: is this for real 350 bass?

Post by JakeK »

So, Paul...Ric never built it?
User avatar
winston
Membership Admin
Posts: 11010
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 am

Re: is this for real 350 bass?

Post by winston »

JakeK wrote:So, Paul...Ric never built it?
No. They did not. But of course I am not Paul. 8)
“We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” - Albert Einstein

"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother" - Albert Einstein
User avatar
thinneckrick
Intermediate Member
Posts: 573
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:59 am
Contact:

Re: is this for real 350 bass?

Post by thinneckrick »

heres somemore eggshells. eggshells, eggshells,eggshells.......
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: is this for real 350 bass?

Post by JakeK »

Oh, those eggshells are from me...

The world's largest omlet can't prepare itself! :P
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”