Instock 360/12c63??

tonewerks · Post by **tonewerks** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:59 am

I have them but I'm not sure how to make them smaller -- I also forgot to mention that the tone pot's werks backwards

oreca · Post by **oreca** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 12:15 pm

Joe: You can send them to me at [email protected] and I'll resize them for you.
Just make sure your e-mail is smaller then 10mb so I can accept it.
Yes you can send multiple e-mails if you have that many pictures you want to show us

tonewerks · Post by **tonewerks** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 12:26 pm

I for got to mention that it has reverse tone controls , single line kusons altho they look to be chrome - neck pup 7.20 bridge 6.18

oreca · Post by **oreca** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 1:35 pm

Alright here's Joe's C63:

It's a nice guitar I must add.

jingle_jangle · Post by **jingle_jangle** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 1:51 pm

It's a lot more than nice! It's breathtaking. Nice to hear that it's accurate in that the controls run backwards!

tonewerks · Post by **tonewerks** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 2:01 pm

Thanks Pat

Scastles · Post by **Scastles** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 2:05 pm

Joe, the single line Klusons really look nifty. Very sharp. Wonderful Ric.

goldenoldie · Post by **goldenoldie** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 4:42 pm

Joe,
Why only an 8?
What have you played that rates a 10?

admin · Post by **admin** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 4:51 pm

Thanks Joe and Pat. This is the look that started it all for me as far as the Rickenbacker 12 string is concerned.

kog · Post by **kog** » Wed Mar 30, 2005 5:42 pm

Wow...that is beautiful. Thanks for the pics, guys. Mine is *sigh* on order, so it'll be awhile. (Anybody know if Gary at NCM takes bribes? Goats, gold bullion, 1st-born male children...? Just asking...)

tonewerks · Post by **tonewerks** » Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:05 am

it get's a 10 for playability.

It gets an 8 for not being 100% historically accurate (non-nickel tuners, non-cloth loom with blue caps, modern plexi, neck pup position drilled for long poles)
I dont think Gary accepts Goats lol I had 3.5 year wait

goldenoldie · Post by **goldenoldie** » Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:23 am

Joe, what did you mean by 'tone pot's werks backwards'?

leftybass · Post by **leftybass** » Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:37 am

The tone pots are wired (and work) in a counter-clockwise fashion, the opposite of the volume pots. This was generally the way that Rickenbackers were configured until around late 1963-early 1964, when the change was made so that all the pots worked the same way, clockwise.

Joe, I have owned some Rickenbackers that pre-date 1963-64 that didn't have cloth insulation on the wiring, and everything was unaltered. I do understand where you are coming from though, I've seen it both ways myself.

tonewerks · Post by **tonewerks** » Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:48 am

my old ones are cloth so I thought this would be too - but I could be wrong ;^}

spencer · Post by **spencer** » Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:50 am

I'll be picking up my 360C63 tommorrow...I can't wait.

April Fools.