Rick 4001s 1964 rose morris

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

route66guitars
Member
Posts: 482
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2004 8:39 am

Post by route66guitars »

Guys. Don't use Richard Smith's shipping totals. They are useless. This has been a known fact since the book first came out. This is why the totals are not included in the Bacon or Rittor books.

I've had dozens more of some models than Richard's totals claimed were shipped.
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

Gerry, Dave Brewis told me in an e-mail he had a 67 too. The definitive totals will always be debated, but the one thing that seems fairly consistent is that there are very few to be seen.
User avatar
atomic_punk
Senior Member
Posts: 5093
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by atomic_punk »

They will always be debated until the definitive Rickenbacker book comes out!! Mr. Hall, we haven't heard from you in a while...are you writing your book? Image
"They make great f***'n basses". - Lemmy, NAMM 2009
route66guitars
Member
Posts: 482
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2004 8:39 am

Post by route66guitars »

John never showed much interest in having production totals out there. I had discussed this with him years ago. I can't imagine his position has changed. I know he still doesn't discuss current shipping totals.
ken_swearingen
Advanced Member
Posts: 2298
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 6:00 pm

Post by ken_swearingen »

Johns, writing his how do i get these Ric. nuts off my back book...haha
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

yeah. Ric nuts, I like that.
User avatar
headbanger
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 735
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2001 10:06 pm

Post by headbanger »

Scott, I agree with you wholeheartedly. At best they can only be a guide but that being said the RM figures in the back are probably the most accurate. All those numbers make sense. Multiples of 25 + a prototype. The serial numbers on the basses so far are very close to each other indicating, to me anyway, that there were 5 batches in 1964. So far it all fits.
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

Colin, here's a couple of pics of my horseshoe and bobbin.
Image
Image
colmerick
New member
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 9:19 am

Post by colmerick »

Thanks to everyone for such a great response and especially to Andrew for the pics of the pickup.
I showed my friend the owner, who for the time being wants to remain anonymous, and he was simply overwhelmed with yoiur info. Huge thanks. He now remebers sending it back to rose morris about 1970ish for a repair because the pickup didnt work, so you guys are spot on. We have taken some pics of the inside with the pickguard off and I hope JohnW will post them for me. To summarize, the there is a mark in thick black ink in the main cavity under the finish, which says 5 E. THere is nothing else, no signatures.The pots are all coded 6401 (the earlier code figures are soldered over), and the wiring looks to be a mix of old and newer. The back of neck has an unusual volute, which may be something added in the neck repair.

Be interested in any further thoughts you may have.
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

Colin, glad to help. The pots date to the first week of 1964. I have a May 64 bass that has a volute too. I originally thought it was a repair but there have been other examples I have seen, so I'm sure it's original. As I mentioned earlier, if you send me an e-mail addy I can send you some good quality pics for reference.
Here's my volute
Image
User avatar
jwilli
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4327
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2000 8:45 pm

Post by jwilli »

Colin sent more pics. Might that fretboard be Brazilian Rosewood?
ImageImageImage
User avatar
jwilli
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4327
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2000 8:45 pm

Post by jwilli »

Image
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

Some of these basses had real dark necks John. This looks the darkest of the lot though! The volute looks a little smaller than my RM, more like the one on the Dec 64 deluxe I have.
Thanks to Colin and John for the pics.
User avatar
seabass
Junior Member
Posts: 114
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 4:49 pm

Post by seabass »

Wow! Now that's what I call Fireglo! (Just like my '72). The new ones don't look like that anymore. Why did they change it?
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Post by ilan »

.
"... The new ones don't look like that anymore. Why did they change it?"

Maybe it's an aging process. The maple darkens, the clearcoat yellows. I'm not sure, just guessing.
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”