"Old School" sound out of a Ric

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

Jeff, what is that, a C63 you're playing there?
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

woops C64
User avatar
86kubicki
Advanced Member
Posts: 2727
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 6:00 am

Post by 86kubicki »

Can't be Jeff - it's a four string.
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

I think it's really a subliminal message about how heavy flatwounds really sound.
User avatar
beatlefan
Senior Member
Posts: 4345
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 4:13 pm

Post by beatlefan »

Jeff R....Hilarious!!

I love it here...
1973 4001 MG cb fwi
1986 4003 Shadow
2012 4004Cii FG w/gold trim
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

actually it is a reversed v63 image ... as long as we don't get personal and don't get mad this can be fun ... and you guys do know I exaggerate a little ...
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

my band is going to do a White Stripes song ... "7 Nation Army" ... it sounds like it was recorded with flat wound strings ... I nailed the exact sound on my 4004L5 with palm muting ... and I did it with round wound strings ...
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

Jeff, maybe a decent reasonable facsimilie but you can't duplicate the bottom of flats by using your palm, a mute or whatever, you only dampen down the overtones of the rounds which is not the same thing. I agree you can get a nice warm middy sound by damping the strings but not a real thumpy flatwound sound.
Try a set you'll see what we are taking about. I have a nice three year old set that are just about broken in I can send you free for just a small handling and postage fee.
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

I have more than enough bottom ... I have a low B string ... I have an ampeg head ... I have a bass pod ... I have 2 speaker cabs and I have a 6000 watt PA with 2 huge 18" folded horn subs ... Low end is not a problem ... I can rattle your teeth and re-arrange your internal organs and produce a thump inside your chest by playing my bass ...
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Post by sloop_john_b »

"Seven Nation Army" isn't a bass - it's an Airline guitar and a Digitech Whammy pedal.
User avatar
atomic_punk
Senior Member
Posts: 5093
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by atomic_punk »

Why don't we get Bob and Jeff in a steel cage grudge match, one armed with a set of rounds, another with a set of flats, and the one who makes it out wins? Let's just end this once and for all! Image
"They make great f***'n basses". - Lemmy, NAMM 2009
User avatar
edski
Advanced Member
Posts: 1589
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:27 am

Post by edski »

I played both my 4001 (with flats) and my 4004 (with RW's) last night...some observations:

The 4001 needs some work...the output jack is a PITA and very tempermental, and the truss rods probably need a tweak, but with the flats I get a serious bottom end, and can get a very good bright sound opening up the tone pots and rolling off the neck PU.

The 4004 (with stock RW's) is very comfortable, but really lacked the bottom I want. But with the added output of the PU's it still cranks. The tonal variations are certainly less than the 4001 with the stock electrical configuration, but I'm not displeased with the 4004-I'm often a "set and forget" player regarding my tone.

If the 4001 strings weren't so fresh I think I'd try RW's on it again now. As it is I'm going to have to use it for a while and sacrifice a good set of flats (I know Jeff Rath thinks that's an oxymoron Image ) before their time.

I have a set of Fender 9050 ML's laying around, so I'm thinking I might use them on the 4004 so I can have a more direct comparison of the sounds of both basses, but it is nice to have variations, so maybe the 4001 is better off with some lighter rounds.

But I still like thud. And lots of it. Image Dino and I must be related somewhere down the line!

One final thought - if I were to dream up a "custom" 4004, it would have separate volume and tone pots for each PU, and ditch the PU selection switch. But as of now I'm not inclined to do any mods to my Laredo. I'll wait till I see how I feel about it with flats on it.
Above e-mail is inactive. try ed_ardzinski@**** where **** is Hotmail.com or Yahoo.com. I tend to see things inthe hotmail box quicker...
User avatar
dannyboy
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 270
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2001 8:30 am

Post by dannyboy »

Hey Jeff, you'll find that "seven nation army" is a great song at first...and don't get me wrong, people always love it... but you'll get tired of it really fast because the bass riff is so boringly repetitive!!! So I started to add variations to it just to wake me up while I 'm playing it!!! Cheers Image
DannyBoy :)
Nowhere man please listen, you don't know what you're missing...
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Post by rickaddict »

John-

Are you sure 7 Nation Army was recorded using a Digitech? I'd heard that Jack White was bent on using 100% analog equipment.
Play what you love, love what you play!
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

You can not get the same sound out of muted rounds as with flats, both strings are good at their respective sounds, but there are areas they won't overlap. I have a bass strung with RW's still, and I've had Fenders on this same bass, is like night and day, even palm muted it won't touch the flats for bottom.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”