21 Fret 4001

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
jayfbv
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 158
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2002 3:10 pm

21 Fret 4001

Post by jayfbv »

This is my Jan '72. I thought it might be interesting to anyone who hasn't followed it on Ask a Luthier. Image
chucksimms
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 604
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 1:16 pm

Post by chucksimms »

That's so cool- is it a smaller scale? I love it... if you ever want to part with it...
'66 365 O.S. FG, '66 335 FG, '68 375 O.S., '66 330/12 MG, '69 365 O.S. azureglo, 2007 4001C64
User avatar
jayfbv
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 158
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2002 3:10 pm

Post by jayfbv »

No, it's the normal scale length of 33.25 on the G string. The bridge center is apparently about a half an inch up from the normal position. Relatively speaking, the pickups are closer to the bridge than normal.

I've seen posts on a.g.r. where this is viewed as a mythical beast.
User avatar
headbanger
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 735
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2001 10:06 pm

Post by headbanger »

James,
I love it. I've seen pictures of a bound neck, dot 4000 etc, but this must be almost unique. I wonder what bridge pickup it had originally?

Anyway I've penciled it in as a must have for my collection....
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Post by leftybass »

Gerard, the bass probably had the under-string bridge p/up rather than the horseshoe-style; they had pretty well switched to the new-style by 1969-1970.

James, are you thinking about putting it back to original specification??
User avatar
jayfbv
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 158
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2002 3:10 pm

Post by jayfbv »

re: Original specs?
Not at the moment -- it's my only bass and I'm using it. Also I've had three professionals look it over and play it. They independently agreed that the button top neck and G&L bridge pickups were keepers. The G&L has three modes - HB, single coil, and single coil with a high cut. I've never heard anything really positive about the original bridge w/mute. The Badass is working fine for me.

I did get a proper toggle switch handle since the pic was taken. Looks better.
User avatar
jwilli
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4327
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2000 8:45 pm

Post by jwilli »

I keep on thinking about that fretboard and the large dots. Did the fretless Rick basses sport larger dots than the 4001S necks? Anyone?
rickcrazy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 4:11 am

Post by rickcrazy »

I've asked this elsewhere ("1973, The Transition Year") and I'll ask it again: just how rare are the 21 fret versions of the 4001 bass? I have one in my collection, serial number JK 340 (November 1970), which I purchased in 1986. In January 1987 I wrote to Rickenbacker and they told me the bass was totally stock except for the pickguard. Anyone?
A Rickenbacker bass is much like the Jaguar E car - perennially ultra-fashionable.
User avatar
headbanger
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 735
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2001 10:06 pm

Post by headbanger »

From my experience of hanging around places like this for the last 4 years I'd have to say that the era from about 1969-1972 were lean years for basses. Not many made to begin with. There seemed to be a lot of experimentation during this time also, set necks, 21 frets, odd binding & so on, maybe because volumes were low.
Certainly uncommon. However, there are at least a few.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”