Who would order a 4005?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

I think a run of 50 or a 100 would be more realistic for a forum based instrument.
A 4005 is an eclectic instrument with nearly all probable demand coming from this forum. I would have thought a 4001V68, (or whatever it would be called!) would be a far more viable proposition with a much wider appeal.

JH has said before there is very little chance of either and even if there was it would be @ $4K buy.
You could of course put a little more money together and buy an original... Image
User avatar
rickinroma
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1109
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:27 pm
Contact:

Post by rickinroma »

RIC made several 1000units limited editions thinking it was worth...why not a 1000/2000 units 4005/V65...and yes as Marc said "At this point, I'd probably be more interested in a re-issue 4005 than a vintage one"
User avatar
jnbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 5359
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2001 7:58 am

Post by jnbass »

I'm in!

Like its gonna happen...
Buy it before someone else does
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by thx1955 »

Jeff,
Those shots of your old "68" are simply gorgeous, I get light headed each time I see them.

That look, that colour, that finish, and modern truss rods, fantastic combination.
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Post by leftybass »

Andy, that bass gets better looking every time I see it, and it was awesome the first time I saw it!! That Gulf Coast living will do it every time man.. LOL
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

someday I may regret selling it ... even though I made a $6350 profit ... that bass just begged to be played with a pick ...
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

Thanks John...You can come and pay a visit down here and get a first hand experience any time...
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by thx1955 »

Andy .. where are you ?
I'll bring mine and we can compare !!!
Image
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
User avatar
gareth
Intermediate Member
Posts: 655
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 8:55 am
Contact:

Post by gareth »

I'd be up for a reissue 4005. As for a 68 reissue, maybe. I'm currently rebuilding my '79 to a more or less 68 spec, with toaster, horseshoe and checkerboard binding.

I'd go for the harder to get 4005 first.
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

Jim ... that looks like a 71-72 4001
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by thx1955 »

Good call Jeff ... it's June 72. "LF"
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Post by ilan »

Not really interested in a 4005, but a 4001v68 in Jetglo, I'm in!
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
User avatar
bottom4
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2063
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 6:24 am

Post by bottom4 »

Jim, Wints, Sweet is all I can say!

Wints, is that a 68 with walnut wings?
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

Yup Andy, original case, strap and polishing cloth too....
Image
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

Andrew ... that must be an OCT/NOV/DEC 1968 4001 one of the first to sport a high gain instead of the horseshoe pickup
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”