Who would order a 4005?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

I would get one too, but I doubt the price would be anywhere near as low as $2000.00, hollow and semi-hollow basses are expensive to make.
User avatar
mgauction
Advanced Member
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by mgauction »

No question. It would be more.
Leprosy is rare & scarce but nobody wants that!
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37498
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

But worth it.
User avatar
nattiep
Advanced Member
Posts: 2389
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 8:33 pm

Post by nattiep »

If they would make a semi hollow in the shape of a normal 4000 series bass with the "slash" I might buy it... would take me awhile to save though. No way I'd pay over 2 grand for a standard model though. I'd want to customize something for that much.
1976 Rickenbacker 4001
2011/05 Fender Standard Fretless Jazz Bass
2005/11 Fender Standard Jazz Bass
User avatar
rickinroma
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1109
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:27 pm
Contact:

Post by rickinroma »

I don't think the magic would be lost with a 4005 vintage reissue serie...maybe the price of the sixties basses would be really high only for the excellent condition units
There are still thousands of musicians willing to spend $$.$$$,00 for a pre-CBS (and post)precision/jazz even if brand new perfect reissues are available..and the magic of old "Tender" is still there
los_sentidos
Member
Posts: 289
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 6:07 am
Contact:

Post by los_sentidos »

$2000 would be a bargain! I'd say even at $3000 you'd be getting a bargain if the build was up to usual Ric quality!
Tell me does it feel the same when you've set upon a change but your heart's in the old times?
los_sentidos
Member
Posts: 289
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 6:07 am
Contact:

Post by los_sentidos »

I do like that idea of a new semi hollow model though Dean!
Tell me does it feel the same when you've set upon a change but your heart's in the old times?
wormdiet
Intermediate Member
Posts: 649
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 5:22 pm

Post by wormdiet »

I would love a 4005, but my max $$ would be $2000. I doubt they would move enough units to cover the retooling costs at such a low price though.

How about a semi hollow using the 330 body??

A v68 would essentially be a 4003 with some mods. A 4005 is a completely new instrument. For the v68, would the general public see enough of a difference beyond current offerings to actually buy any?
"The only worthwhile conquests are those wrested from ignorance"
-Napoleon
325_fan
Member
Posts: 368
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 6:24 am

Post by 325_fan »

I certainly would!!!

../5/58215.html"#EECD9C">
poptones
New member
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 8:49 pm

Post by poptones »

Wow - i'll have to take out a loan but sod it, you can put me down for one as well - especially if they added a few more colours to the palate (i guess this is asking to much from such a customer driven company ;) )

Those things are beautiful.
"I eat digestives..."
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

We'd never get a quality semi-hollow body bass for 2000.00. Even in their day they were more expensive than 4001's were. I would think $3000-$4000 would be more like it, which I would gadly pay.
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

A V68 would be a nice bass but I think the stupid cumbersome horseshoe pickup would kill it for many players even though it would also attrack the lunatic fringe, haha! (calm down, just a joke now!)
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”