1972 Fireglo 4001 on the 'Bay

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

route66guitars
Member
Posts: 482
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2004 8:39 am

Post by route66guitars »

Am I the only one that lost interest in these basses when they discontinued the one piece neck?

Regardless of the other transitional features that bass may have, the laminated neck has always been the deal breaker for me.
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by thx1955 »

Personaly I like the skunk stripe.
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
modelcitizen
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2001 1:39 pm

Post by modelcitizen »

Same here, beautiful contrast to the rest of the wood, esp. in a FG finish.
My (recently aquired) '79 4001LH also has an amazing aged fireglow, much warmer and smoother transition than what Ric seem to finish now (and what's up with the fireglow on the C64 and v63? ugggggly...). The skunk stripe peeking through the finish is the icing on the cake I reckon!
Image
rickcrazy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 4:11 am

Post by rickcrazy »

Hey, Neil, I don't want to be a wet blanket here, but as far as you can tell, is the bridge/tailpiece assembly on your lefty 4001 an original Rickenbacker part?
A Rickenbacker bass is much like the Jaguar E car - perennially ultra-fashionable.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Post by rickaddict »

I grew up with the skunk stripe and baby headstock. I like the way they look. For a long time, the older ones just looked weird to me. I now have a v63 and a c64 in my stable and as much as I like them, something about them just doesn't feel as "familiar" as my older 4001/4003's.
Play what you love, love what you play!
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by thx1955 »

A nice c64 is my next target ..... anyone have one they'd like to consider selling ?

Fireglo of course !!!
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
ken_swearingen
Advanced Member
Posts: 2298
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 6:00 pm

Post by ken_swearingen »

Im not a big fan of the skunkstrip either.
modelcitizen
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2001 1:39 pm

Post by modelcitizen »

Sergio: Yep, looks like it. The bridge/saddles are brand new (not even any string notches filed in), but the tailpiece has a couple of marks and that ever-so-slight lift in the tail that comes from years under string tension. Also looks identical in every way to my 4003's tailpiece.

Pickguard, pickups and knobs are changed, possibly the tuners also 'cause they're awfully clean and have very new looking black plastic "scuff" pads between them and the headstock.

I'm not fussed that it's not totally original...I had wanted pretty much this setup for a while, and since it was gonna be played RH I figured originality would be thrown out the window anyway! Image I'm a player first and foremost...
rickcrazy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 4:11 am

Post by rickcrazy »

Hey Neil, thanks for your reply. I asked that bridge/tailpiece question because I do remember seeing, not too many months back, a lefty '79 Fireglo 4001 on Gbase with a horseshoe pickup and a replacement ('AllParts'?) bridge/tailpiece assembly, which was not mentioned.
A Rickenbacker bass is much like the Jaguar E car - perennially ultra-fashionable.
modelcitizen
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2001 1:39 pm

Post by modelcitizen »

Hmm, could be the same one 'cause it's Gbase where I found it. To be honest I wouldn't know what an Allparts tailpiece looks like...it might be one though. The string holes are more oval, less "squared" than the tailpiece on my 4003. Couldn't really compare to my 4008 (totally different tailpiece) or my 4001 (Ibanez?) copy.

I guess i'd be a little happier if I knew it was an original tailpiece, but since it's got so much mojo playing and tone-wise, i'm not too worried. A bass is a tool to me, Rickenbackers just happen to be very well-made, quirky and gorgeous tools!

Cost me $1200, but there don't seem to be many FG leftys for sale, but as soon as I saw that horseshoe, just had to have it. Wife wants a new car now, typical, just 'cause I have a new toy! Image
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

Under 20 mins left and at $1350....Time to take a seat and watch the last hectic 15 mins....
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

And the hammer drops at $1975...That seems about right for this bass.
If values keep going up the way they have, it will soon become very hard to find these pre 73 basses under $2K...
User avatar
marc61
Senior Member
Posts: 6443
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 9:31 am
Contact:

Post by marc61 »

Bob Atherton got an absolute steal on his.
" It's not where you are, it's who you're with.".
User avatar
atomic_punk
Senior Member
Posts: 5093
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by atomic_punk »

And to think it had a BIN of $1295 when it started....
"They make great f***'n basses". - Lemmy, NAMM 2009
seth_lorinczi
Junior Member
Posts: 171
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 5:00 am

Post by seth_lorinczi »

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't a '73 with checkerboard, toaster but no FWMOP go for $2200+ recently? Now THAT seems a little off to me....
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”