JG to MG

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
charlyg
Senior Member
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 2:01 am

JG to MG

Post by charlyg »

Would I be completely stupid if I turned my JG into an MG? It is an 87 4003. I REALLy like the looks of the MG and my JG finish needs help, I suppose I could sell and rebuy an MG from that era but my 4003 is not a "collector's" item anyway.
User avatar
dswp
Senior Member
Posts: 3778
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 11:29 am

Post by dswp »

DON'T DO IT.

It's cheaper by far to sell the JG, and buy the MG. No matter what condition the JG is in...
User avatar
charlyg
Senior Member
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 2:01 am

Post by charlyg »

Actually, let me rephrase that,I wouldn't mind doing Jeff's tung oil on it as a refinish. I have no idea what the wood looks like underneath tho.
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by aceonbass »

There's a reason that it's jetglo and it's probably due to the woodgrain that's underneath.
User avatar
charlyg
Senior Member
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 2:01 am

Post by charlyg »

I had a suspicion they might use the "lesser" looking wood for the jetglos.
1rr3l3v4n7
Junior Member
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 9:46 am

Post by 1rr3l3v4n7 »

Maybe you could scrape it just a bit, so you can see the wood it's made of...





whoooo... spooky...
Yes, I played one... and I know!
mikeylc
Member
Posts: 236
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2003 11:52 am
Contact:

Post by mikeylc »

I've stripped two white RICs and unlike other manfacturers, I thought the maple underneath was quite nice. One even had nice "birdseye" wings. The grain patterns didn't line up perfectly but I still thought it was a nice as some of the mapleglos and not as nice as some of the others. I really don't like white and BT and since I needed to fix a few cracks and really see what the cracks really entailed I stripped the bass. I fixed the cracks and shot it with a couple of coats of sanding sealer. I must admit it looked pretty nice. From my experience, which is limited to two RIC instruments and a boat of Fender and Gibsons, I haven't found the same **** under a solid RIC that you would under the other two. As for a tung oil finish it would be easy - strip and oil. If you had somebody refin for you in nitro, poly or CV it be around 400-500 bucks. I just had my Azureglo redone by Michael Dolan and it was somewhere in that range including shipping. Or course if I had a JG and was gonna refin, I'd go with another cool RIC color, like AG, Silver, Ruby.
a couple of Shadows a Blackstar and an Annie.
User avatar
lars
RRF Consultant
Posts: 809
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by lars »

I wouldn't change the color of a bass unless it was already refinished.
User avatar
edski
Advanced Member
Posts: 1589
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:27 am

Post by edski »

I'm in Lars camp, but hey, do what you like. Image The natural finish is beatiful if it's done well. If it's not, well...ends up looking like my 65 Mustang!

I don't have any pics of that thing, but when I bought it someone had long ago taken off the red finish that originally was on it. How do I know it was a red? There's at least three spots the idiot didn't get it all, as if he/she/it dodn't think to take the guitar apart before raping it...

Either way, the 'Stang is a great guitar, unlike many Mustangs. And the fact that the finish sucks made it very easy to gig with-not much was going to hurt that finish.
Above e-mail is inactive. try ed_ardzinski@**** where **** is Hotmail.com or Yahoo.com. I tend to see things inthe hotmail box quicker...
User avatar
charlyg
Senior Member
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 2:01 am

Post by charlyg »

Oops, my bad, I was thinking about a 64 and a half candy apple red REAL mustang! You know, the Ford one!
User avatar
dswp
Senior Member
Posts: 3778
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 11:29 am

Post by dswp »

If we were talking about Mustangs, I would agree with Ed

Image
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

This bass was originally J/G or B/G. Stripped before I got it and yes, I do wish it was original, but it doesn't look too bad imo..
Image

Hey, it's your bass Charly, do as you see fit...
User avatar
dswp
Senior Member
Posts: 3778
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 11:29 am

Post by dswp »

Here's my 73 refin in MG, it was AZ blue

Image
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

This '73 started out as jetglo, then it was pained red, then it was painted white, then it was stripped, then it was finished mapleglo, then it was wired like a jazz bass, then I restored it stock, then I used it for 2 years, then Cooper used it for 2 years ...

Image Image
apollo11
Intermediate Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 6:00 am

Post by apollo11 »

That is some really nice wood grain for a bass that was originally jetglo. The back is gorgeous.
Andrew
'05 4001C64, Fireglo
'03 4003, Jetglo
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”