Ric humbucker, difference between neck and bridge?

Setup, repair and restoration of Rickenbacker Instruments

Moderator: jingle_jangle

Post Reply
rockettone
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2002 11:14 am

Ric humbucker, difference between neck and bridge?

Post by rockettone »

Does anyone here know the difference between the neck and bridge humbucker? is the bridge just wound to be hotter so the output level is the same between the two? Or, are there other, tone differences? I ask because I have a toaster in the neck and wonder if the neck version would have a closer sound level to it.
Josh
bruceglaser
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 107
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2000 1:55 pm

Post by bruceglaser »

I posed this question to customer service at Rick awhile ago. I was told that even though they have different part numbers, both pickups are identical.
rockettone
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2002 11:14 am

Post by rockettone »

I just got a response from ric myself a little while ago. They said that same thing, Really weird that they would do that. Evidently, they do the same with the hi-gains.
User avatar
kranz
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2002 4:36 pm

Post by kranz »

A pair of RIC humbuckers were just auctioned on ebay. The seller stated that "One pickup reads 8.7 K and the other reads 14.4 K". If correct, it would lead one to believe that the neck and bridge PUs are wound differently.
"Les is more"
User avatar
kranz
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2002 4:36 pm

Post by kranz »

Well, curiousity got to me so I measured the PUs on my 2002 360. Bridge was 10.58K. Neck was 10.64K. This would indicate that they are indeed the same.
"Les is more"
Post Reply

Return to “"Vibrola" Rickenbacker Technical Forum: By Paul Wilczynski”