Hard to tune

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
lars
RRF Consultant
Posts: 809
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:00 am
Contact:

Hard to tune

Post by lars »

User avatar
bob_the_bass
Member
Posts: 339
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:29 am

Post by bob_the_bass »

Who strung that !?
Why does it happen? Because it happens - Roll the Bones !!
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

more like a 96.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37515
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

"Priced to sell" Ha ha ha !
endlessbassic
New member
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 12:01 pm

Post by endlessbassic »

..i think that's the trick for maintaining proper tension on the truss rod cover.. heh.. yeah.
User avatar
ali_b
New member
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 12:37 am

Post by ali_b »

and the case does't look 2 foot longer than the bass Image
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6263
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Post by cheyenne »

Bid on it! Its worth it just to get the strap.

Image
"Knowledge is Power"
User avatar
edski
Advanced Member
Posts: 1589
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:27 am

Post by edski »

New case...TRC doesn't say "Model 4001"...

Not sure about the veracity of this being a 70's model.
Above e-mail is inactive. try ed_ardzinski@**** where **** is Hotmail.com or Yahoo.com. I tend to see things inthe hotmail box quicker...
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

it's late 90's 4003.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Post by rickaddict »

What could people hope to gain by stringing their Ricks like this? I see it a lot. Does it "look cool" or something?!
Play what you love, love what you play!
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Post by rickaddict »

My call: 1996
Play what you love, love what you play!
ken_swearingen
Advanced Member
Posts: 2298
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 6:00 pm

Post by ken_swearingen »

It looks like it might be a 86,4003 its got the fatter horns typical for 80s early 90s,and the case is not 29 inches longer then the bass,as for the strap,thats to die for.
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

I thought 96 also as I posted early in this thread, they didn't use those cases at least until the early 90's I'm pretty sure. It's also got the ribbed pickups which weren't around again until sometime in the 90's, not sure of the year. The basses horns were the same from about the mid- late 70's until the late 90's so you can't go by that. I have never seen a 6' 2" case in my life unless it was an upright case.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Post by rickaddict »

Hmmmm...a 6'2" case could double as a canoe if you got into a bind. I think I should bid on it!

I agree on the pickup bars beginning in the '90s. I have a couple '87s and an '88 that don't have the bars. I have a '94 that does have bars.
Play what you love, love what you play!
ken_swearingen
Advanced Member
Posts: 2298
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 6:00 pm

Post by ken_swearingen »

You guys are probably right i just wasn't sure when in the 90s they changed the shape of the 4003 to resemble todays,now we know 97. And Jeff definitely a nice canoe if you find yourself up a creek.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”