#7!
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Yes, but if you pay double, it makes it more valuable;>)
50's Rics while rare to me(while I would love to own one)are not as collectible as the 60's and 70's.
Not sure what legendary musicians actually used them. To me what seems to make musical instruments valuable is the legends that used them.Paul McCartney, Chris Squire, nuff said. The 50's basses are more important from a historical aspect as they led into what became the 4001.
I'd rather have a 63 or 64 rick, and definately an RM before I'd pay that kinda dough for a 50's model.
50's Rics while rare to me(while I would love to own one)are not as collectible as the 60's and 70's.
Not sure what legendary musicians actually used them. To me what seems to make musical instruments valuable is the legends that used them.Paul McCartney, Chris Squire, nuff said. The 50's basses are more important from a historical aspect as they led into what became the 4001.
I'd rather have a 63 or 64 rick, and definately an RM before I'd pay that kinda dough for a 50's model.
" It's not where you are, it's who you're with.".
I was wondering when this was going to appear. Craig has a lot of connections and looking (for the time being) at a healthy $10K profit here he might need them...
They are very cool the 50's basses, but personally they don't get it done for me like the 60's versions.
Well, I would say that wouldn't I....
They are very cool the 50's basses, but personally they don't get it done for me like the 60's versions.
Well, I would say that wouldn't I....

-
ken_swearingen
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2298
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 6:00 pm
-
throw_this_away
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 618
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 2:59 am
- Contact:
- atomic_punk
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 5:00 am
- Contact:
-
ken_swearingen
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2298
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 6:00 pm

