Jeff has this process down to an art form. From the string spacing to the pickup coverage and the dimension of the fretboard, these basses are very cool and play great.
I think I have played every one (except for this one) and they are all impressive, especially compared to his 4003s5's, which are on hand for side-by-side comparisons.
Nice work, my friend. Paul is going to be a happy man!!
"They make great f***'n basses". - Lemmy, NAMM 2009
I am not a luthier ... and my work is not Ric factory quality ... but I am good a setting up ric basses and making a few modifications ... I don't replace fretboards, I don't install binding, etc ... it is kind of scary to take a really nice Ric bass and drill holes in it ...
This bass turned out good ... the 4004CII basses have a nice sound ... they are different than the 4004CI or the 4004L basses ... also the ones with the pickup location 1" off the neck are brighter than the ones with the pickup jammed against the neck ...
for pure playing ease my 4-2-5 p-basses are perfect because I can get a 2 1/2" spacing at the bridge and 1 5/8" at the nut ... the 4004 4-2-5 is 2 3/8" at the bridge which is good but not optimal and my 4003 4-2-5 is 2 1/4" at the bridge which is workable but a little tight ... but all those are better than the 2 1/16" of the 4003s5 ... but even that is workable ... especially if you are a pick player ... but I always convert my 4003s5 basses to 2 1/4" spacing ...
also I have learned to take pictures that make the quilting/flaming in the wood look good ... getting the right angle and the right lighting and adjusting the image in photoshop are all important ...