Could I have one in FG please....
370/12 SPC Questions
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
-
tony_carey
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2055
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
-
jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Not to deviate from the SPC...but will. If we're talking Anniversary I wish John would elaborate on the 'F' hole, like maybe its return on a certain model. Or maybe the statement I read, elsewhere, by him was just something to 'put the dogs on another scent'.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Music is too important to be left to professionals.
Music is too important to be left to professionals.
Wow this thread turned out to be more fun that I had imagined! I want to believe there is a pallet of lightshows somewhere... 
"While there are some other 21-fret 370/12s made since, they are definitely distinguishable from the RM "overruns". They have the sharp upper horn, non-lacquered nut, smaller dots on the binding, and all of the other small but noticeable changes made to the guitars in the '95-'96 general area. "
So does this mean an educated eye can help me figure out if I have a RM body from a photo of the upper horn? And/or a photo of the dots on the binding?
I got much info on the history of my guitar from the fellow I bought it from (and believe it), but wanted to understand what might be 'legend' and what might be 'fact' - I think I'm the 3rd owner, so there may have been some 'telephone game' syndrome on it. It is MG, checked binding, square heel, grommets, old strap pegs. I think the wiring has been re-done - it has a push-pull pot on the blend knob. And I think the nut has been replaced because it is white. The warranty card has in marker 'sample - must sell as second' (or similar - its not in front of me).
As always, thanks!
"While there are some other 21-fret 370/12s made since, they are definitely distinguishable from the RM "overruns". They have the sharp upper horn, non-lacquered nut, smaller dots on the binding, and all of the other small but noticeable changes made to the guitars in the '95-'96 general area. "
So does this mean an educated eye can help me figure out if I have a RM body from a photo of the upper horn? And/or a photo of the dots on the binding?
I got much info on the history of my guitar from the fellow I bought it from (and believe it), but wanted to understand what might be 'legend' and what might be 'fact' - I think I'm the 3rd owner, so there may have been some 'telephone game' syndrome on it. It is MG, checked binding, square heel, grommets, old strap pegs. I think the wiring has been re-done - it has a push-pull pot on the blend knob. And I think the nut has been replaced because it is white. The warranty card has in marker 'sample - must sell as second' (or similar - its not in front of me).
As always, thanks!
-
scoobster28
- Veteran RRF member
- Posts: 707
- Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2001 1:16 pm
Hi all,Been away for awhile. In response to a request from Kevin,(Hi Kevin, my ser# is 12 away from your's)I'm posting a pic of my 370/12SPC. I bought it second hand, so I'm not sure if it has been modified. Jan.'96, has 12 saddle bridge, grommets, vintage tuners, lacquered nut, square heel, check binding, old strap buttons, smaller side markers, headstock is a little narrower than McGuinn, great thin neck, more like a 60's, warranty card --'370/12 SPC:MG'.
John Minutaglio, I could tell easily with a quick photo of the front of the guitar. John Vallee, your guitar certainly appears to be what I always called a RM "overrun". I'd really like to see a picture of the headstock, since you say it is narrower.
My use of the term does not imply that the guitar was ever intended to actually be a RM, or that the 660/12s were ever intended to be Pettys. I just have always been pretty sure that the bodies in question came off the line along with the RMs and Pettys and were left to linger at the factory, whatever the reason.
My use of the term does not imply that the guitar was ever intended to actually be a RM, or that the 660/12s were ever intended to be Pettys. I just have always been pretty sure that the bodies in question came off the line along with the RMs and Pettys and were left to linger at the factory, whatever the reason.
