Ugly new pickguard

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
lars
RRF Consultant
Posts: 809
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:00 am
Contact:

Ugly new pickguard

Post by lars »

In a thread about a month ago Dane Wilder brought up the new Pg-design.

http://www.rickresource.com/cgi-bin/discus/show.cgi?tpc=5&post=147505#POST147505

I agree totally. The curve is kind of "un-harmonic". When did this start? Any opinions?
rickcrazy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 4:11 am

Post by rickcrazy »

"The curve is totally 'un-harmonic'". I concur. I believe the 'new' pickguard was introduced circa 1997.
A Rickenbacker bass is much like the Jaguar E car - perennially ultra-fashionable.
keb
Junior Member
Posts: 162
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 1:08 pm

Post by keb »

To be perfectly honest I never really noticed a difference until you brought it up.
User avatar
heinpete
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 10:08 pm

Post by heinpete »

... no need to buy a replacement, just sand the hump away a little bit.-
Now everybody have a sharp look at the pickguard!
(Might turn out like the scene with Obelix and the nose of the sphinx???)
"The youth of today should start thinking about the state in which they want to leave this planet to Keith Richards..."! Quote by an unknown musician
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

the ugly pickguard is the 4000 basses from the 50s ...
kcole4001
Senior Member
Posts: 3368
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 7:07 pm

Post by kcole4001 »

When did the new design start? I never noticed either! Easy to fix, though, as Peter said.
Plus five minus five!
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

probaby 1998 ... that's when the body and headwings changed to a 60s shape ...
User avatar
lars
RRF Consultant
Posts: 809
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by lars »

I wonder why! Mr. Hall?
User avatar
lars
RRF Consultant
Posts: 809
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by lars »

Image

just to see and compare
User avatar
bobcat
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1319
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 6:54 pm

Post by bobcat »

Um . . . I can't tell the difference?
rickon
New member
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 6:48 am

Post by rickon »

Glad somebody else noticed. Thought it was just me.
loendmaestro
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1495
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:53 pm
Contact:

Post by loendmaestro »

Doesn't seem like that big of a deal to me....
User avatar
lars
RRF Consultant
Posts: 809
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by lars »

Yes! It's a big deal!
Look at the part of the pg where the controls are. On the jetglo bass in the illustration, the revealed part of the body between the binding and the pg increases evenly, forming a perfect harmonic shape. On the fireglo the pg has a hump that distorts the curve!
User avatar
wim
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1486
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 1:37 am

Post by wim »

As perfect as I think the contours of Rickenbacker guitars and basses are, I find this really 'disturbing' the picture.
Can't use 'ugly' on a ric.
User avatar
lars
RRF Consultant
Posts: 809
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by lars »

OK disturbing
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”