Need help on deciding new 12 string

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

skeeterbuck
Junior Member
Posts: 165
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 5:00 am

Need help on deciding new 12 string

Post by skeeterbuck »

I in the process of looking to buy a new Ric 12 string. I am considering the 381/12V69 but am concerned about the string spacing because of the neck binding.
If I'm not mistaken, The Rics with binding have a more narrow string spacing at the nut as compared to the models that don't have neck binding.
Also, with the exception of the 660 series are all the ric necks the same width and thickness?

I will have to buy through the mail so I won't have the chance to play it in person.
User avatar
winston
Membership Admin
Posts: 11010
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 am

Post by winston »

Welcome Charles,

There are several threads on the forum devoted to this same pursuit. If you care to peruse them your questions will almost certainly be answered.
“We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” - Albert Einstein

"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother" - Albert Einstein
User avatar
winston
Membership Admin
Posts: 11010
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 am

Post by winston »

Here's a link to the last discussion.

../7/67049.html"#FFEECC">
“We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” - Albert Einstein

"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother" - Albert Einstein
User avatar
winston
Membership Admin
Posts: 11010
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 am

Post by winston »

Here is another.

../7/62013.html"#EECD9C">
“We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” - Albert Einstein

"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother" - Albert Einstein
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by jingle_jangle »

Briefly, Skeeter, if you replace the nut on the 381V69/12 with a factory nut from a 330/12, you'll have the wider string spacing. You can order one from RIC or one of Rickenbacker's dealers if you are in the USA. Otherwise, it'll have to come through your local distributor.
“I say in speeches that a plausible mission of artists is to make people appreciate being alive at least a little bit. I am then asked if I know of any artists who pulled that off. I reply, 'The Beatles did.”
― Kurt Vonnegut
skeeterbuck
Junior Member
Posts: 165
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 5:00 am

Post by skeeterbuck »

Thanks Brian and Paul for the help.

I did remember reading something about the nut spacing being different between necks with binding verses neck without. When I did a search to find the info again, what I was looking for didn't come up.
User avatar
tony_carey
Advanced Member
Posts: 2055
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by tony_carey »

Welcome Charles. I play a 381-12 regularly & it plays, looks & sounds fantastic. A 360V64 is also worth checking out & when the dust has settled, try a humble 330-12....great, great sound!
'Rickenbacker'...what a name! After all these years, it still thrills me.
User avatar
johnhall
RIC
Posts: 3926
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2000 11:17 am
Contact:

Post by johnhall »

I'll also take this opportunity to mention that there's some erroneous info posted about this at some other boards. All of the 12 string spacings were readjusted back in the mid 1990's sometime- I remember posting the exact date right off the CAD files somewhere recently- and we chose to have different spacing for instruments with and without binding. We still don't feel it's good practice to have the edge of the binding in the playing field on the fret board. However, enough people (at least vocal ones) have chosen to disregard our advice so we said, okay, let's just have one wider style that fits all, which happened to be the 330/12 style. We have less SKU's to produce and people get what they want, so who are we to complain?

Anyway, my point is that the calculations for the spacings were done here and done years ago. This was done with CAD and simulation to take into account the diameter of each string, how it vibrates, and how it might interact with it's mate, rather than a simplistic divide-up-the-space scheme.

Grover Jackson did the bulk of the actual design work on this with some technical assistance and guidance from me. It didn't come from anywhere else.
User avatar
steverok
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1139
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 7:16 pm
Contact:

Post by steverok »

So, you are saying that 360/12 and 330/12 have the same nut? That would invalidate the argument that the 330/12 has more room. I look at many pictures of Ric's at the nut, and they all look the same. The spacing at the bridge, however, seem to vary from axe to axe.
"Say what you like about the tenets of national socialism, Dude, at least it's an ethos." - Walter Sobchak.
skeeterbuck
Junior Member
Posts: 165
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 5:00 am

Post by skeeterbuck »

Thanks for the welcome Tony. I've been a member on the Ric forum for awhile, I just don't post very often. I would rather "listen" most of the time and let others do the "speaking".

Now, as to the 381/12, I was never a great fan of this model. It was something about the German carved edge (I think that's how its referred to) That kind of turned me off. But over the years its grown on me that now I find it rather pleasing and definitely unique. The only thing that would make it better would be if it was offered in a three pickup model. Would that make it a 391?/12?

To Steve... The spacing at the bridge probably varies slightly because this operation is done by hand. If you happen to look at a twelve string with the twelve saddle bridge, you can easily tell it now done with a machine or template.
User avatar
ozover50
RRF Consultant
Posts: 10492
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Contact:

Post by ozover50 »

Aha!!! Another 'lurker'...........

Image

Welcome from me also, Charles!
"Never eat more than you can lift." - Mr. Moon
User avatar
tony_carey
Advanced Member
Posts: 2055
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by tony_carey »

I totaly agree Charles. I never particularly liked the 381's carve, but like you, it has grown on me. You can always add a third pick up.....it's easy to do & I do it to every 330 I get.
'Rickenbacker'...what a name! After all these years, it still thrills me.
User avatar
krick
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2067
Joined: Sun May 06, 2001 2:09 pm
Contact:

Post by krick »

Here is a "381" with 3 pickups and some other modifications:

http://www.stthomasu.ca/~pmccorm/research/thacker39112.jpg
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by jingle_jangle »

Tasteful. Subtle.

Migod, Peter, that's not yours is it?
“I say in speeches that a plausible mission of artists is to make people appreciate being alive at least a little bit. I am then asked if I know of any artists who pulled that off. I reply, 'The Beatles did.”
― Kurt Vonnegut
User avatar
melibreits
Senior Member
Posts: 4081
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2003 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by melibreits »

Bling-bling! Image
"Once I've held and played the best, baby, I won't settle for less!"
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”