Maple 650C?

Modern years of Rickenbacker Guitars from 1984 to the present

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
eatswodo
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 710
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2001 5:22 am

Maple 650C?

Post by eatswodo »

Prowling around GBase, I found this:

http://www.gbase.com/gearlist/guitar_picture.asp?guitar=408557

Apart from the fact that it's gorgeous, can anyone shed any light on it? If it's a 650C, it should be jetglo, shouldn't it - is this a new model I've missed somewhere along the way?

Cheers,
David
dave4004
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1113
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 7:49 pm

Post by dave4004 »

The 650C is apparently now available in all the standard finishes. I know that Mike Parks (The Rickenbacker Page) recently got a new one in Burgundy, it sold quickly. Still shown on his New Ricks page, here's the enlarged photo: http://www.the-music-connection.com/pics/r397.jpg
User avatar
eatswodo
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 710
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2001 5:22 am

Post by eatswodo »

Burgundy or Mapleglo - what a choice. They both look delicious!
corey

Post by corey »

Amazing!

If I wasn't such a mark for the 300 series, I'd seriously consider a 650C in Mapleglo.
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15124
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by admin »

I agree, these are great looking. Not too shabby in Jetglo either.
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm

Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
bruceglaser
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 107
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2000 1:55 pm

Post by bruceglaser »

I have one of these left handed.
User avatar
jwilli
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4327
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2000 8:45 pm

Post by jwilli »

A 650 is what you hand some moron when they say that RICs are rhythm guitars............
User avatar
rkbsound
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1205
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 3:48 pm
Contact:

Post by rkbsound »

"...who could ask for anything more?"
aladams

Post by aladams »

WOW! The Best of all Worlds! Humbuckers and wide neck like a Gibson, Maple neck and playability like a Fender Strat and the KILLER looks of the finest guitar made...RICKENBACKER! Mr. John Hall: this is a very hard act to follow! AL A.
User avatar
carr
Member
Posts: 274
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2001 2:17 pm

Post by carr »

I have yet to get my hands on a 6xx Ric.

Can anyone give me a feature by feature comparison with say a 330 or 360?

John
shiraz
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2002 3:28 am

Post by shiraz »

Those mapleglo 650s are divine!
My 650A is a great guitar. I still prefer my 300 series Rics... I've never been into solid-bodies.
As everyone is keen to point out, the 600 series Rics can indeed jangle and sparkle. But the volume and tone controls seem to have a massive sweep. They are your best friend on a 650.
You can make it sustain endlessly. It sings better than any Gibson. Mine has the VB option vibrato bridge. Since I'm a Ric vib/Bigsby vib devotee, it took me some time to get used to the modern vibrato. Yes, you can dive-bomb with it if you fancy that.
So my overall feeling is that -for my tastes and my playing- the 300 series Rics are supreme. The 600s may well be your cup of tea. You might find a soulmate. Either instrument could be your one-and-only guitar.
I find myriad uses for my 650 in recording situations. Its tone let's it fit with any song style. Still, whether you're playing distorted, clean, or with heaps of effects, it still has a Ric vibe.
I may love my 650 even more if I had a coil tap installed...
John, to answer your question, the 650s have humbuckers (unless you special order single coils), 3-way switch, 2 vol, 2 tone pots, no blend knob, modern bridge with roller saddles, neck-through-body construction, and a chunky neck. I'm less knowledgable about the 610s (though they are probably the sound between a 650 and a 330).
The 330/360 have a set-in neck, single coil pickups (HiGains or Toasters though Humbuckers are available as an option), 2 vol, 2 tone, and a blend knob, a trapeze (or R) tailpiece, 3-way switching, and more mojo.
Cheers, Noel
User avatar
dannyboy
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 270
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2001 8:30 am

Post by dannyboy »

I have traded in my 330 for a 650 and I can tell you right now that I will not go back. Not that I didn't like the 330, I tought it was the greatest guitar for me compare to my old Strat and my Epiphone Les Paul. BUT... I found that it was too noisy and it bugged me a lot. Now it's another ball game...the 650 is so great to play with and the sound is so bluesy, so warm that I just fell in love again! If you have a chance, you should try one! Dan Image
DannyBoy :)
Nowhere man please listen, you don't know what you're missing...
philco
Intermediate Member
Posts: 849
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 4:59 pm

Post by philco »

I would like to second what John Williams mentioned in a previous post. When my youngest brother, who once played in a hard rock band and used a Washburn and a Charvel through a Randall halfstack, got his hands on my new 650D, he wasn't making any jingle jangle rhythm sounds with it. He went straight into Joe Satriani and Eddie Van Halen covers, and had my Marshall amp turned up to about an 8 or 9 on the gain and master volume controls. He thinks the 650D is a really nice hard rocking lead guitar. The humbuckers are very quiet, and that is really important is high gain music styles. The 650C should give you an almost identical sound for $300 more at retail. The only reason I ordered one is that I also wanted a Rick with vintage toasters, and the availability of optional finishes allowed me to order it in midnight blue, so that it would look different than my natural 650D and Jetglo 4004L.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: Modern Years - After 1983”