4001CS on the bay!

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

highway_star
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1028
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:33 pm
Contact:

Post by highway_star »

I've put a watch on it to see how high it goes. I may jump if it stays below $3500. That is, unless someone else is really interested and ready to pull the trigger.
If you think all is going well, you've obviously overlooked something.
User avatar
s4001
Senior Member
Posts: 3514
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by s4001 »

'sold it' TO ME!!!!!! :D
"If you think you can or if you think you cannot - either way you are right." Henry Ford.
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

I am waiting for the seller to get back to me about going to see and play the bass. I may make him an offer....
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Post by rickaddict »

Not doubting the awesomeness of the CS, but do they really sound/play different from a v63?
Play what you love, love what you play!
User avatar
henny
Advanced Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 1:35 pm

Post by henny »

That isn't Beaver Feltons', is it, of Bass Central?

He has a mint, and I mean, COMPLETELY minted example. He's from round that end, no?

Jeff - not from what I've heard. The CS guys can enlighten you more, they're supposed to feel a little more compact, so I've heard.
User avatar
incubus2432
Senior Member
Posts: 4174
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 11:26 am

Post by incubus2432 »

Only one certificate # off! Beaver's is #792 and the one on Ebay is #793.



(hehehehe........he said beaver.......hehehehehe)
User avatar
s4001
Senior Member
Posts: 3514
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by s4001 »

The neck is a little chunkier. The fretboard radius is wide so it's a flat neck, but the neck itself is fatter than a regular 60's Ric. The edges of the fretboard aren't as rounded at on my '68. The body is the same size as near as I can tell.
"If you think you can or if you think you cannot - either way you are right." Henry Ford.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37498
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

When I checked out the ex-Crisman CS, it seemed identical to my V63 except for the obvious things like the finish, and the roundwounds and action vs. the flats on my V63. Nice bass, but not enough difference to consider getting; if I didn't already have the V63, that CS would be mine right now. Image
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

I've e-mailed the guy three times asking to be able to look at the bass and have yet to receive a reply...
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2781
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Post by henry5 »

I've owned 2 CSs and 1 V63 and the V63 sounded very little like the CSs, other than they all sounded like Ricks...the V63 was slightly more detailed and "airy" (as were the other V63s I've played), but the CSs were brighter, harder and punchier.....both my CSs have had the early "thin" neck profile whereas my V63 had the later fatter profile. Which was better? Depends on your taste. They were definitely very different though.
"Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle."
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37498
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

My V63 has the thinner neck profile. What is it that makes the CS brighter and more agressive sounding? The Vermillion fingerboard and headstock wings? The pickups and electronics are the same AFAIK.
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

In my experience, no two sound exactly alike. Even otherwise identical basses can have their own personalities. My Tux and my Blackstar have identical construction and electronics but they do not sound alike. They both sound like Ricks but they have different voices. The Tux has a softer, warmer tone. The BlackStar is a bright and totally balls out sounding bass. I attribute the differences to variations in the wood (resonance), the shape of the neck, and perhaps subtle differences in the electronics. Fingerboard wood definitely figures in the final tone.
User avatar
thinneckrick
Intermediate Member
Posts: 573
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:59 am
Contact:

Post by thinneckrick »

I have never came across a rick yet with the same neck profile ! I have literally had a dozen of them and they were all different. I've also found that the ones with thinner neck have better attack . Bright and punchy but not overkill . The bigger necks are sluggish and have dead spots .as well as a distorted tone
im getting to old for this ****
highway_star
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1028
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:33 pm
Contact:

Post by highway_star »

Is "cowchevy" one of us?
If you think all is going well, you've obviously overlooked something.
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2781
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Post by henry5 »

Ted's bang on the money for me (as usual). All my Ricks sound/have sounded different, even acoustically, played side by side. My current CS and my old one were very similar though, although not exactly the same. I also tend to find the solid colour Ricks sound slightly harder and less "airy" to my ears, strange as it may seem.
"Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle."
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”