A couple of days with the 4005 now.

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

325_fan
Member
Posts: 368
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 6:24 am

Post by 325_fan »

Threads and posts like this one make me wonder why Rickenbacker doesn't reissue the 4005.
throw_this_away
Intermediate Member
Posts: 618
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 2:59 am
Contact:

Post by throw_this_away »

When the owner of the company thinks it is ugly as sin... and they have sold poorly in the past, it is hard to build much of a case.

a redesigned hollow body bass on he other hand...
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Post by ilan »

"When the owner of the company thinks it is ugly as sin..."

I still think he was joking.

If indeed JH thinks that the 4005 is "ugly as sin", then what must he think of the 360?

Quote from the RIC website: "this Deluxe hollow body with its special contour around the entire body perimeter, is still perhaps the most comfortable guitar of all. The bound body and Rosewood fingerboard, inlayed with triangular pearloid markers, provide an exceptionally attractive appearance"...
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

The 360 is similar but not the same as the 4005. the 360 has asthetically better proportions IMHO. There is little doubt that the 4005 is based on the the shape of the 360 but the longer neck of the bass on that light weight body can complicate things a bit. I am just guessing here but the longer horn on the 4005 is probably there to give it better balance on a strap. I don't think John was kidding. The 4005 was discontinued soon after he took the RIC helm.
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by aceonbass »

I had a '66 4005 back around the time Yes' Drama album came out and I distinctly remember that bass NAILING Squires sound on Does It Really Happen(which to me is the quintessential 4001 sound).'Nuff said about it sounding like or better than a 4001/3.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37515
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

Image

You got it!
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

I have played Jeff's 4005WB. It is an great bass. I never thought much of the 5 until I played his.
ken_swearingen
Advanced Member
Posts: 2298
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 6:00 pm

Post by ken_swearingen »

Jeff,doesnt have a bad bass,the action on every one of his basses is very low without buzz,hes become a pro. at setup.
User avatar
rickinroma
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1109
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:27 pm
Contact:

Post by rickinroma »

Jeff is the 4005 club leader ;-)
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37515
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

Aw, shucks!
User avatar
beatlefan
Senior Member
Posts: 4345
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 4:13 pm

Post by beatlefan »

Show us the way, the way of the 4005, Sensei!!
1973 4001 MG cb fwi
1986 4003 Shadow
2012 4004Cii FG w/gold trim
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”