A couple of days with the 4005 now.
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
-
throw_this_away
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 618
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 2:59 am
- Contact:
"When the owner of the company thinks it is ugly as sin..."
I still think he was joking.
If indeed JH thinks that the 4005 is "ugly as sin", then what must he think of the 360?
Quote from the RIC website: "this Deluxe hollow body with its special contour around the entire body perimeter, is still perhaps the most comfortable guitar of all. The bound body and Rosewood fingerboard, inlayed with triangular pearloid markers, provide an exceptionally attractive appearance"...
I still think he was joking.
If indeed JH thinks that the 4005 is "ugly as sin", then what must he think of the 360?
Quote from the RIC website: "this Deluxe hollow body with its special contour around the entire body perimeter, is still perhaps the most comfortable guitar of all. The bound body and Rosewood fingerboard, inlayed with triangular pearloid markers, provide an exceptionally attractive appearance"...
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
The 360 is similar but not the same as the 4005. the 360 has asthetically better proportions IMHO. There is little doubt that the 4005 is based on the the shape of the 360 but the longer neck of the bass on that light weight body can complicate things a bit. I am just guessing here but the longer horn on the 4005 is probably there to give it better balance on a strap. I don't think John was kidding. The 4005 was discontinued soon after he took the RIC helm.
-
ken_swearingen
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2298
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 6:00 pm
- rickinroma
- RRF Consultant
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:27 pm
- Contact:
