A Badly Wanted FG 73....
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
-
highway_star
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:33 pm
- Contact:
- chefothefuture
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 1886
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 6:00 am
It's interesting to hear those high amounts.
I'm nuts but how far is too far?
Ken just sold a 72 that was better wood for $3200.
About a month ago a 73 with all the features went for
$2500.
How does that song go?
"Makes me wonder........"
Now to attend to that bustle in my hedgerow.......
chefy likes! chefy wants!

I'm nuts but how far is too far?
Ken just sold a 72 that was better wood for $3200.
About a month ago a 73 with all the features went for
$2500.
How does that song go?
"Makes me wonder........"
Now to attend to that bustle in my hedgerow.......
chefy likes! chefy wants!


'68 4001MG, '70 4001 21Fret, '71 4001S MG, '71 4001FG, '72 4001AZ, '73 4001FG, '73 4001resto, '59 365FG, '96 381/12v69FG, '71 4001 21Fret FG
-
throw_this_away
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 618
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 2:59 am
- Contact:
- incubus2432
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4174
- Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 11:26 am
- chefothefuture
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 1886
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 6:00 am
- chefothefuture
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 1886
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 6:00 am
Jeff Rath (Jwr2) posted
I actually agree. I would sooner buy a new/newish 4003 than another vintage Rick, or any vintage bass for that matter. I have a 75 4001; that's exotic enough. I really don't want to play the 75 too much anymore, as it's getting close to museum status.
A new 4003 with the walnut, a mapleglo...hmmmmm...
I basically decided on the 4004 based on the fact that my 4001 is basically a 4003...there are a few things about the 4001 I don't like; fussy output jack, the body binding...but I lived with these flaws happily for a long time!
But I wanted to have a bit of a change (note: I played a fretless J bass as my main bass for a number of years)...
But a new 4003, working fine, no neck issues, would be a great back up bass for me. It'd probably grab a fair amount of playing time.
you guys can have the old basses ... I'll take the newer ones with stronger necks and less fretware and less yellowing and less rust ...
I actually agree. I would sooner buy a new/newish 4003 than another vintage Rick, or any vintage bass for that matter. I have a 75 4001; that's exotic enough. I really don't want to play the 75 too much anymore, as it's getting close to museum status.
A new 4003 with the walnut, a mapleglo...hmmmmm...
I basically decided on the 4004 based on the fact that my 4001 is basically a 4003...there are a few things about the 4001 I don't like; fussy output jack, the body binding...but I lived with these flaws happily for a long time!
But I wanted to have a bit of a change (note: I played a fretless J bass as my main bass for a number of years)... But a new 4003, working fine, no neck issues, would be a great back up bass for me. It'd probably grab a fair amount of playing time.

Above e-mail is inactive. try ed_ardzinski@**** where **** is Hotmail.com or Yahoo.com. I tend to see things inthe hotmail box quicker...

