Neck thickness.

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Post by rickaddict »

Andy-

At which fret are you taking these measurements?

I measured some of my Ricks a while back to compare them. I took a string and wrapped it around the neck to measure its girth right before the first fret. I don't remember the exact measurements, but I do remember that my '98 v63 and my '03 C64S were about 1/8" larger in girth than any of my older Ricks. The 1987 4003S was the smallest but was close to all of my late 70's 4001s.
Play what you love, love what you play!
david_schwab
Member
Posts: 392
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:44 am
Contact:

Post by david_schwab »

Jass basses have those stupid narrow necks up by the nut... give me a P neck any day!
kbhag
Junior Member
Posts: 156
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 3:00 pm

Post by kbhag »

Fender, by way of example, makes a good instrument. And the one thing they've figured out is that some players just want the "original" Vintage configuration. Might not be the absolute best, but lots of players buy 'um. Those custom shop "relic" guitars and basses sell for big money. The point is that they sell.
rickfan63
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 896
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 8:30 am

Post by rickfan63 »

I know some people won't agree with me on this. But I like the thicker 4003 necks,and the thinner necked Ricks, like my V63. I've never had a problem with either one, and I have fairly small hands.
I recently went back to playing a Rickenbacker bass. Its like meeting an old friend again
User avatar
jaybic
Member
Posts: 487
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by jaybic »

I really enjoy the thicker necks. I have long fingers and like the extra girth to fill up my hands while I play
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

Jeff,

they were taken at the 2/3rd fret. I know that's not the proper way to measure, just trying to get an idea out there.

Ken, I don't have a radius gauge, but if I wrap a piece of string across the fretboard and neck tight, then straighten it out, it comes to 4 and 1/4".
throw_this_away
Intermediate Member
Posts: 618
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 2:59 am
Contact:

Post by throw_this_away »

Neck thickness/shape is not so key for me. I find I am most comfortable with what I play the most at a given time.

Before I got my rics I hated any neck that wasn't a jazz neck. Now that I have my rics and play them way more than the jazz... the jazz neck taper feels less like home, and I find the neck a little thick when playing higher notes. Still, a few bars into a song and I am not thinking about it anymore.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Post by rickaddict »

Andy-
By "2/3rd fret," do you mean halfway between the 2nd and the 3rd frets, or 2/3 of the way to the first fret?
Play what you love, love what you play!
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

End of 2nd and beginning of 3rd fret Jeff.
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by jingle_jangle »

Hmm. What "relic" and "original configuration" have in common, I'm not certain.

"Relic" guitars are phoney. Fake. They are a cynical attempt by Fender's Marketing department, to fleece guitar players whose critical faculties are out to lunch.

And the attempt worked. Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American guitar player. (Mencken paraphrased.)
“I say in speeches that a plausible mission of artists is to make people appreciate being alive at least a little bit. I am then asked if I know of any artists who pulled that off. I reply, 'The Beatles did.”
― Kurt Vonnegut
User avatar
bobcat
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1319
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 6:54 pm

Post by bobcat »

I love the thinness of the J-bass neck at the nut. The reason I like Ric necks more than J-bass necks, despite the comparative thickness at the nut is that Ric necks change very little as you move towards the body. There's a very minute difference in thickness/width/whatever. On a J-bass, it starts out really nice and thin, and then suddenly, WHAM, it fans out like crazy. That and I can't stand bolt-on necks. They sound fine, but they just feel wrong in my hands. I wonder what a neck-through Jazz would be like . . .
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15145
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by admin »

While the discussion with regard to relics is an interesting one, within the context of neck thickness, the tone of the comments in a few posts became heated and hence they were deleted.

My apology to those who may have had legitimate comments. It is difficult to do partial edits and hence complete posts have been deleted here. Also, some posts made reference to posts that had been deleted and so seemed out of context. They too were removed.
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm

Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
ken_swearingen
Advanced Member
Posts: 2298
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 6:00 pm

Post by ken_swearingen »

Thanks Peter.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”