New English for europeans

Off Topic discussion forum

Moderators: ajish4, cjj

Post Reply
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37503
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

New English for europeans

Post by jps »

Subject: The European Commission and Euro-English

The European Commission has just announced an agreement whereby English will
be the official language of the European Union rather than German, which was
the other possibility.

As part of the negotiations, the British Government conceded that English
spelling had some room for improvement and has accepted a 5- year phase-in
plan that would become known as "Euro-English".

In the first year, "s" will replace the soft "c". Sertainly, this will make
the sivil servants jump with joy. The hard "c" will be dropped in favour of
"k". This should ! klear up konfusion, and keyboards kan have one less
letter.

There will be growing publik enthusiasm in the sekond year when the
troublesome "ph" will be replaced with "f". This will make words like
fotograf 20% shorter.

In the 3rd year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted to
reach the stage where more komplikated changes are possible. Governments
will enkourage the removal of double letters which have always ben a
deterent to akurate speling.

Also, al wil agre that the horibl mes of the silent "e" in the languag is
disgrasful and it should go away.

By the 4th yer people wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing "th" with
"z" and "w" with "v".

During ze fifz yer, ze unesesary "o" kan be dropd from vords kontaining
"ou" and after ziz fifz yer, ve vil hav a reil sensibl riten styl.

Zer vil be no mor trubl or difikultis and evrivun vil find it ezi tu
understand ech oza. Ze drem of a united urop vil finali kum tru.

Und efter ze fifz yer, ve vil al be speking German like zey vunted in ze
forst plas.


HAPPINESS ALWAYS
User avatar
winston
Membership Admin
Posts: 11010
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 am

Post by winston »

Dis vill be a sertanty fur sur.
“We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” - Albert Einstein

"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother" - Albert Einstein
User avatar
ozover50
RRF Consultant
Posts: 10492
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Contact:

Post by ozover50 »

Hahahahahahaha!!
"Never eat more than you can lift." - Mr. Moon
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Post by sloop_john_b »

Ve vant ze money, Lebowski!
User avatar
desertgoldenboy
Member
Posts: 316
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 4:28 am
Contact:

Post by desertgoldenboy »

Uh...what?
"If things were different...things would be different."
User avatar
desertgoldenboy
Member
Posts: 316
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 4:28 am
Contact:

Post by desertgoldenboy »

Thatz phunnee, Jeph! (a reversal)
"If things were different...things would be different."
User avatar
sowhat
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5380
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2003 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by sowhat »

Mine nu abaut it in 2004! 8-)
Kul!
Shina (btw, what would be the replacements for "sh" and "ch"?).
Nothing will get you dead quicker than being deadly serious about yourself.
rob
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1037
Joined: Mon May 21, 2001 10:01 am

Post by rob »

Zoundz lik kornee po-po and pe-pe to me!
User avatar
jaybic
Member
Posts: 487
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by jaybic »

This reminds me of a story my mom tells. She is a kindergarten teacher who had an exceptionally bright little girl. When it was time for their "reading" time - the little girl said, "I don't know why I have to study Pa-Honics. I can already read."
User avatar
scott_s
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2001 12:59 pm

Post by scott_s »

I prefer the Mark Twain joke:

A Plan for the Improvement of English Spelling
by Mark Twain

For example, in Year 1 that useless letter "c" would be dropped to be replased either by "k" or "s", and likewise "x" would no longer be part of the alphabet. The only kase in which "c" would be retained would be the "ch" formation, which will be dealt with later. Year 2 might reform "w" spelling, so that "which" and "one" would take the same konsonant, wile Year 3 might well abolish "y" replasing it with "i" and Iear 4 might fiks the "g/j" anomali wonse and for all.

Jenerally, then, the improvement would kontinue iear bai iear with Iear 5 doing awai with useless double konsonants, and Iears 6-12 or so modifaiing vowlz and the rimeining voist and unvoist konsonants. Bai Iear 15 or sou, it wud fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi ridandant letez "c", "y" and "x" -- bai now jast a memori in the maindz ov ould doderez -- tu riplais "ch", "sh", and "th" rispektivli.

Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hev a lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe Ingliy-spiking werld.
User avatar
sowhat
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5380
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2003 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by sowhat »

Haha! You all laugh at it (and me too), but in Russia, this kind of "reform" is discussed seriously... 8-) no i'm not kiddin'.
Cirs,
Yina.
Nothing will get you dead quicker than being deadly serious about yourself.
kcole4001
Senior Member
Posts: 3368
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 7:07 pm

Post by kcole4001 »

We could all become functionally illiterate if this keeps up Image
Plus five minus five!
User avatar
eatswodo
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 710
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2001 5:22 am

Post by eatswodo »

Check out the Harmony Central Discussion Forums. I think it's already happened Image
kcole4001
Senior Member
Posts: 3368
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 7:07 pm

Post by kcole4001 »

Ah, but those guys don't play Ricks! Image
Plus five minus five!
Post Reply

Return to “The Others: by CJ Johansson”