My official COY guess

cheyenne · Post by **cheyenne** » Mon Jan 02, 2006 1:38 pm

I smell V68 for NAMM.

walnut wings, vintage tint

beatlefan · Post by **beatlefan** » Mon Jan 02, 2006 1:41 pm

It may cause me to order a standard 4003 with the new walnut wings, amber fireglo and.....vintage pickup? Yeah, that sounds good.....

beatlefan · Post by **beatlefan** » Mon Jan 02, 2006 1:42 pm

I hope you're right , Scott....but based on comments by JH in the past....I don't know.....

jps · Post by **jps** » Mon Jan 02, 2006 1:42 pm

AFG is going to look great on the walnut wing 4003s!!!

nattiep · Post by **nattiep** » Mon Jan 02, 2006 1:43 pm

Pfft! That's lame! Couldn't they have just made their recent FG's less pink? Then we could have a new CoY. The vintage look is nice, but I wouldn't want to pay extra for a normal color.

aceonbass · Post by **aceonbass** » Mon Jan 02, 2006 1:46 pm

Hmm...John Hall said no new color "per se". My wife brought up an interesting point..what if it's not a color but a pattern of some sort? Plaid, paisley, checkerboard maybe?

cheyenne · Post by **cheyenne** » Mon Jan 02, 2006 1:46 pm

I like the modern fireglo myself.

beatlefan · Post by **beatlefan** » Mon Jan 02, 2006 1:47 pm

Now I can read the term "per se" in peace once again...

rickenbrother · Post by **rickenbrother** » Mon Jan 02, 2006 1:47 pm

I don't think it's lame, Nate. The COY will have a cool vintage look especially with the walnut head wings...it would be awesome if checkered binding came with COY on a 4003.

jnbass · Post by **jnbass** » Mon Jan 02, 2006 1:48 pm

AFG the COY,

WW, VPuP...

Quilted MG?

cheyenne · Post by **cheyenne** » Mon Jan 02, 2006 1:50 pm

How hard would it be to make Amber mapleglo also??

ken_swearingen · Post by **ken_swearingen** » Mon Jan 02, 2006 2:01 pm

"How hard would it be to make Amber mapleglo also??"

I think that might be a possibility also check out the 300 series guitars.

johnhall · Post by **johnhall** » Mon Jan 02, 2006 2:07 pm

Naw, we tried some samples and were considering it but it just wasn't that interesting.

rickfan60 · Post by **rickfan60** » Mon Jan 02, 2006 2:08 pm

Damn, I actually guessed it this time!

beatlefan · Post by **beatlefan** » Mon Jan 02, 2006 2:11 pm

This is very cool.....makes me wonder what's up for NAMM.....

any more clues, John? or are we too close to guessing??