D'addario medium scale complaint

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
throw_this_away
Intermediate Member
Posts: 618
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 2:59 am
Contact:

D'addario medium scale complaint

Post by throw_this_away »

A few months back I got 45-100 d'addario nickel round wound strings that were long scale to put on my 72' 4001. The action was sweet and I really liked the strings so I got some new ones today... but noticed a set that were in medium scale so I tried them out instead.

Rics are medium scale are they not? Well the D, A, and E strings all had the strings change thickness about midway between the nut and first fret (you know what I mean) once they were trimmed and wound. This resulted in the strings being too low for the A and E strings and terrible buzzing when playing the string open. I solved the problem by boosting the height of the strings at the nut by placing a sliver of cut G string in the V of each nut.

Still... the strings are changing thickness at the first fret... and I can feel it.

I won't be buying medium scales again. Anyone else have similar issues? Or better fixes?
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13222
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Post by rickenbrother »

John, do you mean medium scale or medium gauge?
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
chefothefuture
Advanced Member
Posts: 1886
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 6:00 am

Post by chefothefuture »

There's a bit of controversy over what is officially Medium scale. It's usually around 32".
Ricks are 33.5". That would make a Rick to me a full scale
bass. But what do I know....
'68 4001MG, '70 4001 21Fret, '71 4001S MG, '71 4001FG, '72 4001AZ, '73 4001FG, '73 4001resto, '59 365FG, '96 381/12v69FG, '71 4001 21Fret FG
User avatar
scott_s
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2001 12:59 pm

Post by scott_s »

Sorry to hear about that, John (Drysdale)! D'Addario measures string length from the nut to the ball end (http://www.daddario.com/DADFaqAnswer.aspx?ID=762) so your Rick probably qualifies as "long scale" once all is said and done.
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

One way (probably the most accurate way) to measure scale is to measure from the inside face of the nut to the 12 fret and then double that distance. In the case of a Rickenbacker bass the nut to 12 fret measurement is 16 5/8". That doubled is 33 1/4". This is the true scale of a Rickenbacker bass. While not the 34" that Fender popularized, is still considered to be long scale. Short scale typically being 30" and medium being 32".
User avatar
scott_s
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2001 12:59 pm

Post by scott_s »

That is the correct way to measure scale length, Ted. Image
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6263
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Post by cheyenne »

I have always used long scale strings with no problems.
"Knowledge is Power"
throw_this_away
Intermediate Member
Posts: 618
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 2:59 am
Contact:

Post by throw_this_away »

Joey, I do mean medium scale (the strings say soft guage, medium scale).

So rics are a small large scale, or a large medium scale. That would probably be why I never had issues with long scale strings. Live and learn I guess. The medium scale strings will stay on till I can afford to get more.
User avatar
hieronymous
Intermediate Member
Posts: 837
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 10:46 pm
Contact:

Post by hieronymous »

My guess is that the 4001/4003 bridge design requires that long-scale strings be used - if I remember correctly (don't have a Ric on hand at the moment) the distance from where the ball-ends rest and the bridge saddles is of a significant length. That distance isn't part of the scale length, but still has to be taken into account. Basses that string through the body can also have this problem. So a short-scale bass, like a Fender Mustang Bass, may require medium-scale strings...
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

Scott: Many people still measure all the way to the bridge saddles, taking the average saddle position. This measurement is close but error prone.
kcole4001
Senior Member
Posts: 3368
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 7:07 pm

Post by kcole4001 »

It's about 2" from the ball end to the saddle on a stock RIC tailpiece. So you need at least 35 1/4" of full thickness of string to properly fit the nut, give or take 1/8 or so for intonation adjustments of course.
Plus five minus five!
ojobob2
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1046
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 5:31 am
Contact:

Post by ojobob2 »

long scale is 34" (ie fender), a rick is 33.25 or 33.5 or something... in other words technically shorter but you still use long scale strings. Medium Scale is 32" i dont know of many basses with that scale but i know some of the new burns basses are that scale. 30" is short scale (gibson EB0...fender mustang, musicmaster etc) although as far as i know some 30" basses need the 32" scale strings due to tailpiece length

Imagein other words what Ted said
The email address shown is down, you can email me at [email protected]
bassman
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 501
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2000 12:27 pm

Post by bassman »

D'Addario identifies their string packages by simply adding the letter L, M or S at the end of the product code for the scale.

XL-170-L (long scale for 33" and up)
XL-170-M (medium for 31-32")
XL-160-S (short for 30")

Check you're packaging John. Your 4001 will always need Long Scale strings. No matter what the brand.
throw_this_away
Intermediate Member
Posts: 618
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 2:59 am
Contact:

Post by throw_this_away »

Yeah, the packaging said medium scale... and I remembered ric's being called medium scale (33 1/4) but I just figured it would be fine.

my bad, oh well. They still sound fine. It is the day after and I am still alive.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”