To Refin or Not to Refin

Exceptional restoration is in the details

Moderator: jingle_jangle

User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by jingle_jangle »

You got your points across very well, Scott. Undoubtedly the discussion ranged a bit wider than you'd thought it would, but hopefully in this Forum, there is a lot of space for a variety of views to be aired. Nobody's accusing you of trying to change any minds.

Have you read the entire thread? There are a lot of contributors from both sides of the aisle, and no firm conclusion yet.

This will not be my last post on the subject.
“I say in speeches that a plausible mission of artists is to make people appreciate being alive at least a little bit. I am then asked if I know of any artists who pulled that off. I reply, 'The Beatles did.”
― Kurt Vonnegut
User avatar
jwilli
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4327
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2000 8:45 pm

Post by jwilli »

Scott, I got your point and I agree with it too. I do like original guitars with their "age spots", etc. I have a ton of them. I also think that there's nothing wrong with a superior resto job, especially if the guitar has been refinned/restored poorly in the past.
Post Reply

Return to “Reflections of a Curmudgeon: by Paul Wilczynski”