Poor 4000,look at the headstock.

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Post by bassduke49 »

Dave, how many Rick basses do you have (including the 4080s)?
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
User avatar
dswp
Senior Member
Posts: 3778
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 11:29 am

Post by dswp »

Paul, a gentleman never kisses and tells... Image

Here's some that I keep in my music room. I keep some in storage too

Image
kcole4001
Senior Member
Posts: 3368
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 7:07 pm

Post by kcole4001 »

...mmmmm..... Image
Plus five minus five!
ken_swearingen
Advanced Member
Posts: 2298
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 6:00 pm

Post by ken_swearingen »

I know of a 1980 4001s set neck for sale for $1300.in good shape if anyone wants one.
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2790
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Post by henry5 »

Quote - "The 4000's DO have significant neck dive factor, but you get used to it after a bit".

My 4000 balances great! But as with 4001s, I'm sure they all vary. My first CS was very neck heavy, despite weighing a ton, whereas my 2nd (which is lighter) balances fine. All my previous 4001s have balanced far worse than my 72, and they were all much heavier as well.

Quote- "Mine is still my best playing bass." - No argument there, mine plays the best of my Ricks. And it sounds phenomenal....
"Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle."
green_us90
Intermediate Member
Posts: 530
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 12:23 pm

Post by green_us90 »

Frickin' Dave Image

Do you have that lefty in the back just to "show off"?
Gitch-Pang, Gitch-Pang- the RIC trademark
kcole4001
Senior Member
Posts: 3368
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 7:07 pm

Post by kcole4001 »

The difference in balance must be in the neck/body wood density. I suppose the proportioning is a little different in each individual bass.
My 4001 balances perfectly, yet with the 4000 I have to use a wide strap to counter the diving tendency.

Where did all the smileys go? Image
Plus five minus five!
kcole4001
Senior Member
Posts: 3368
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 7:07 pm

Post by kcole4001 »

They're back. Image
Must have been a problem at my end. There were little square blocks with a period in the center where there should have been smileys.

Dave's not showing off, he's stocking up a new Rick museum Image
Plus five minus five!
User avatar
dswp
Senior Member
Posts: 3778
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 11:29 am

Post by dswp »

Dave,

It's a 4003 MB, VP, VC, LH, RH

RH is the right hand stringing of a left handed instrument option.
green_us90
Intermediate Member
Posts: 530
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 12:23 pm

Post by green_us90 »

Wow that's a lot of alphabet soup.
Does it play ok, right handed strung of lefty? I assume you had to move the strap pins?
Gitch-Pang, Gitch-Pang- the RIC trademark
User avatar
dswp
Senior Member
Posts: 3778
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 11:29 am

Post by dswp »

A head diver for sure.

A second strap pin was added by the dealer.
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2790
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Post by henry5 »

Agreed about the relative density Kevin. Using my CSs as an example you'd think it more likely that the heavier bass would be LESS headstock heavy, not more, but that wasn't the case. I've pretty much always found the heavier basses seem to balance worse in my experience. I'd say my 4000 balances as well as any Rick I've ever owned...in fact it's my most comfortable gigging bass.
"Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle."
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”